mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] w1: masters: omap_hdq: Add support for 1-wire mode
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:49:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513134958.e21e538c3c8fe00d3fcd8854@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430728735-22747-1-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com>

On Mon, 4 May 2015 14:08:55 +0530 Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com> wrote:

> This patches makes following changes to omap_hdq driver
>  - Enable 1-wire mode.
>  - Implement w1_triplet callback to facilitate search rom
>    procedure and auto detection of 1-wire slaves.
>  - Proper enabling and disabling of interrupt.
>  - Cleanups (formatting and return value checks).
> 
> HDQ mode remains unchanged.
> 
> ...
>
> +/*
> + * W1 triplet callback function - used for searching ROM addresses.
> + * Registered only when controller is in 1-wire mode.
> + */
> +static u8 omap_w1_triplet(void *_hdq, u8 bdir)
> +{
> +	u8 ret, id_bit, comp_bit;
> +	struct hdq_data *hdq_data = _hdq;
> +	u8 ctrl = OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS_SINGLE | OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS_GO |
> +		  OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS_INTERRUPTMASK;
> +	u8 mask = ctrl | OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS_DIR;
> +
> +	omap_hdq_get(_hdq);
> +
> +	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&hdq_data->hdq_mutex);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		ret = -EINTR;
> +		goto rtn;

Has this code path been tested?  What happens when it is taken?  Driver
initialization fails?  If so, why is this desirable behaviour?

> +	}
> +
> +	hdq_data->hdq_irqstatus = 0;
> +	/* read id_bit */
> +	hdq_reg_merge(_hdq, OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS,
> +		      ctrl | OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS_DIR, mask);
> +	wait_event_timeout(hdq_wait_queue,
> +			   (hdq_data->hdq_irqstatus
> +			   & OMAP_HDQ_INT_STATUS_RXCOMPLETE),
> +			   OMAP_HDQ_TIMEOUT);

It seems bad to ignore a timeout.  Shouldn't the code clean up and
report error when this occurs?


> +	id_bit = (hdq_reg_in(_hdq, OMAP_HDQ_RX_DATA) & 0x01);
> +
> +	hdq_data->hdq_irqstatus = 0;
> +	/* read comp_bit */
> +	hdq_reg_merge(_hdq, OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS,
> +		      ctrl | OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS_DIR, mask);
> +	wait_event_timeout(hdq_wait_queue,
> +			   (hdq_data->hdq_irqstatus
> +			   & OMAP_HDQ_INT_STATUS_RXCOMPLETE),
> +			   OMAP_HDQ_TIMEOUT);

Here too.

> +	comp_bit = (hdq_reg_in(_hdq, OMAP_HDQ_RX_DATA) & 0x01);
> +
> +	if (id_bit && comp_bit) {
> +		ret = 0x03;  /* error */
> +		goto rtn;
> +	}
> +	if (!id_bit && !comp_bit) {
> +		/* Both bits are valid, take the direction given */
> +		ret = bdir ? 0x04 : 0;
> +	} else {
> +		/* Only one bit is valid, take that direction */
> +		bdir = id_bit;
> +		ret = id_bit ? 0x05 : 0x02;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* write bdir bit */
> +	hdq_reg_out(_hdq, OMAP_HDQ_TX_DATA, bdir);
> +	hdq_reg_merge(_hdq, OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS, ctrl, mask);
> +	wait_event_timeout(hdq_wait_queue,
> +			   (hdq_data->hdq_irqstatus
> +			   & OMAP_HDQ_INT_STATUS_TXCOMPLETE),
> +			   OMAP_HDQ_TIMEOUT);

And here.

> +	hdq_reg_merge(_hdq, OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS, 0,
> +		      OMAP_HDQ_CTRL_STATUS_SINGLE);
> +
> +rtn:
> +	mutex_unlock(&hdq_data->hdq_mutex);
> +	omap_hdq_put(_hdq);
> +	return ret;
> +}
>
> ...
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04  8:38 Vignesh R
2015-05-13  7:26 ` Vignesh R
2015-05-13 15:03   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2015-05-13 20:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2015-05-15 12:05   ` Vignesh R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150513134958.e21e538c3c8fe00d3fcd8854@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®