From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964978AbbENTKx (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 15:10:53 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:40257 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964816AbbENTKw (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 15:10:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 20:10:31 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Brian Austin , Bard Liao , Oder Chiou , Wolfram Sang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam Message-ID: <20150514191031.GS2761@sirena.org.uk> References: <554E8634.2010008@maciej.szmigiero.name> <20150512175807.GL3066@sirena.org.uk> <5553BAB4.3040209@maciej.szmigiero.name> <20150514175351.GQ2761@sirena.org.uk> <5554ED71.4040608@metafoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fCjW77bNSYaih4x3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5554ED71.4040608@metafoo.de> X-Cookie: 13. ... r-q1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs-ac97: make selectable in config X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --fCjW77bNSYaih4x3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:46:09PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 05/14/2015 07:53 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >select doesn't respect dependencies, it'll just force on the selected > >symbol. > The patch works fine, neither SND_SOC_AC97_BUS nor the symbols selected by > SND_SOC_AC97_BUS have any dependencies. Does the select from SND_SOC_AC97_BUS actually happen if it is selected by SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS? That's the issue, if it works now it's a relatively recent thing. --fCjW77bNSYaih4x3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVVPMnAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQt7UH/2QB42+b17u+mDyLz6wscekP tmN0E+OPyhYWQIgKyhialNjGZV3AAu72lP0Ic4VAj3CdnSg24fsYq//IK4VeERts G1JvK6zU/41OWILHqsyZgoWXJyHBa56VV3y+dtxy8NOqVKRSX2njtpP5IxqvgNj+ wH3ZM8romS5/NxM5/Q88bkHWu8JDL5rq9003ZR5ZOux/BEEtqAHVNfGUbvDy68vO aOzM+cXdJ3muLknuyc0DCZhdO81FhXBPcWxJrm5a+Gyf2g9GB5Uqr/3XS4/yWULO bl/i0rGi9vjIV7MPS1eSipkaiUYY0UA0s7Y2FxuRIqDoT6Bf7SuPpWQo4UykTL4= =MWq6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fCjW77bNSYaih4x3--