mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	eparis@parisplace.org, arozansk@redhat.com, serge@hallyn.com,
	zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 05/10] audit: log creation and deletion of namespace instances
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 22:32:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150515023221.GC965@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12675437.ssZNCck7zG@sifl>

On 15/05/14, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:57:14 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 03:57:59 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > On 15/05/05, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > > I think there needs to be some more discussion around this. It seems
> > > > like this is not exactly recording things that are useful for audit.
> > > 
> > > It seems to me that either audit has to assemble that information, or
> > > the kernel has to do so.  The kernel doesn't know about containers
> > > (yet?).
> > 
> > Auditing is something that has a lot of requirements imposed on it by
> > security standards. There was no requirement to have an auid until audit
> > came along and said that uid is not good enough to know who is issuing
> > commands because of su or sudo. There was no requirement for sessionid
> > until we had to track each action back to a login so we could see if the
> > login came from the expected place.
> > 
> > What I am saying is we have the same situation. Audit needs to track a
> > container and we need an ID. The information that is being logged is not
> > useful for auditing. Maybe someone wants that info in syslog, but I doubt
> > it. The audit trail's purpose is to allow a security officer to reconstruct
> > the events to determine what happened during some security incident.
> 
> As Eric, and others, have stated, the container concept is a userspace idea, 
> not a kernel idea; the kernel only knows, and cares about, namespaces.  This 
> is unlikely to change.
> 
> However, as Steve points out, there is precedence for the kernel to record 
> userspace tokens for the sake of audit.  Personally I'm not a big fan of this 
> in general, but I do recognize that it does satisfy a legitimate need.  Think 
> of things like auid and the sessionid as necessary evils; audit is already 
> chock full of evilness I doubt one more will doom us all to hell.
> 
> Moving forward, I'd like to see the following:
> 
> * Record the creation/removal/mgmt of the individual namespaces as Richard's 
> patchset currently does.  However, I'd suggest using an explicit namespace 
> value for the init namespace instead of the "unset" value in the V6 patchset 
> (my apologies if you've already changed this Richard, I haven't looked at V7 
> yet).

The "unset" (none) value is only there before the first namespaces have
been created.  After that, any new ones are created relative to the init
namespace of that type.

> * Create a container ID token (unsigned 32-bit integer?), similar to 
> auid/sessionid, that is set by userspace and carried by the kernel to be used 
> in audit records.  I'd like to see some discussion on how we manage this, e.g. 
> how do handle container ID inheritance, how do we handle nested containers 
> (setting the containerid when it is already set), do we care if multiple 
> different containers share the same namespace config, etc.?

(Addressed in another reply.)  Nested will need some careful thought...

> * When userspace sets the container ID, emit a new audit record with the 
> associated namespace tokens and the container ID.

That was the goal of AUDIT_VIRT_CONTROL or AUDIT_NS_INFO messages from
userspace into the kernel.

> * Look at our existing audit records to determine which records should have 
> namespace and container ID tokens added.  We may only want to add the 
> additional fields in the case where the namespace/container ID tokens are not 
> the init namespace.

If we have a record that ties a set of namespace IDs with a container
ID, then I expect we only need to list the containerID along with auid
and sessionID.

> Can we all live with this?  If not, please suggest some alternate ideas; 
> simply shouting "IT'S ALL CRAP!" isn't helpful for anyone ... it may be true, 
> but it doesn't help us solve the problem ;)

Thanks Paul.

> paul moore

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-17  7:35 [PATCH V6 00/10] namespaces: log namespaces per task Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 01/10] namespaces: expose ns_entries Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 02/10] proc_ns: define PROC_*_INIT_INO in terms of PROC_DYNAMIC_FIRST Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 03/10] audit: log namespace ID numbers Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 04/10] audit: initialize at subsystem time rather than device time Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 05/10] audit: log creation and deletion of namespace instances Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-05 14:22   ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-05 14:31     ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-05-05 14:46       ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-05 14:56     ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-05 15:16       ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-12 19:57     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-14 14:57       ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-14 15:42         ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-14 16:21           ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-15  2:03           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-14 19:19         ` Paul Moore
2015-05-15  1:31           ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-15  2:25             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-15 13:17             ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-15 14:51               ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-15 21:01             ` Paul Moore
2015-05-15  2:32           ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2015-05-15  6:23             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-15 12:38               ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-15 13:17                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-15 21:05               ` Paul Moore
2015-05-16  9:46                 ` Daniel J Walsh
2015-05-16 12:16                   ` Paul Moore
2015-05-16 14:46                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-16 22:49                       ` Paul Moore
2015-05-19 13:09                         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-19 14:27                           ` Paul Moore
2015-05-15  0:48         ` Richard Guy Briggs
     [not found]           ` <CAA4jN2bgynVTwF+owtXgq06JMLQJpy_qokpD0mAguNYeDxmh1A@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-15  2:11             ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-15 13:19               ` Daniel J Walsh
2015-05-15 20:42             ` Paul Moore
2015-05-15 20:26           ` Paul Moore
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 06/10] audit: dump namespace IDs for pid on receipt of AUDIT_NS_INFO Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 07/10] sched: add a macro to ref all CLONE_NEW* flags Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  8:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-17 15:42     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 17:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-17 22:00         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 08/10] fork: audit on creation of new namespace(s) Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 09/10] audit: log on switching namespace (setns) Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17  7:35 ` [PATCH V6 10/10] audit: emit AUDIT_NS_INFO record with AUDIT_VIRT_CONTROL record Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-21  4:33 ` [PATCH V6 00/10] namespaces: log namespaces per task Eric W. Biederman
2015-04-23  3:07   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-23 20:44     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-24 19:36       ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-04-28  2:05         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-28  2:16           ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-08 14:42             ` Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150515023221.GC965@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
    --to=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=arozansk@redhat.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®