From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
eparis@parisplace.org, arozansk@redhat.com, serge@hallyn.com,
zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 05/10] audit: log creation and deletion of namespace instances
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 22:32:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150515023221.GC965@madcap2.tricolour.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12675437.ssZNCck7zG@sifl>
On 15/05/14, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:57:14 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 03:57:59 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > On 15/05/05, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > > I think there needs to be some more discussion around this. It seems
> > > > like this is not exactly recording things that are useful for audit.
> > >
> > > It seems to me that either audit has to assemble that information, or
> > > the kernel has to do so. The kernel doesn't know about containers
> > > (yet?).
> >
> > Auditing is something that has a lot of requirements imposed on it by
> > security standards. There was no requirement to have an auid until audit
> > came along and said that uid is not good enough to know who is issuing
> > commands because of su or sudo. There was no requirement for sessionid
> > until we had to track each action back to a login so we could see if the
> > login came from the expected place.
> >
> > What I am saying is we have the same situation. Audit needs to track a
> > container and we need an ID. The information that is being logged is not
> > useful for auditing. Maybe someone wants that info in syslog, but I doubt
> > it. The audit trail's purpose is to allow a security officer to reconstruct
> > the events to determine what happened during some security incident.
>
> As Eric, and others, have stated, the container concept is a userspace idea,
> not a kernel idea; the kernel only knows, and cares about, namespaces. This
> is unlikely to change.
>
> However, as Steve points out, there is precedence for the kernel to record
> userspace tokens for the sake of audit. Personally I'm not a big fan of this
> in general, but I do recognize that it does satisfy a legitimate need. Think
> of things like auid and the sessionid as necessary evils; audit is already
> chock full of evilness I doubt one more will doom us all to hell.
>
> Moving forward, I'd like to see the following:
>
> * Record the creation/removal/mgmt of the individual namespaces as Richard's
> patchset currently does. However, I'd suggest using an explicit namespace
> value for the init namespace instead of the "unset" value in the V6 patchset
> (my apologies if you've already changed this Richard, I haven't looked at V7
> yet).
The "unset" (none) value is only there before the first namespaces have
been created. After that, any new ones are created relative to the init
namespace of that type.
> * Create a container ID token (unsigned 32-bit integer?), similar to
> auid/sessionid, that is set by userspace and carried by the kernel to be used
> in audit records. I'd like to see some discussion on how we manage this, e.g.
> how do handle container ID inheritance, how do we handle nested containers
> (setting the containerid when it is already set), do we care if multiple
> different containers share the same namespace config, etc.?
(Addressed in another reply.) Nested will need some careful thought...
> * When userspace sets the container ID, emit a new audit record with the
> associated namespace tokens and the container ID.
That was the goal of AUDIT_VIRT_CONTROL or AUDIT_NS_INFO messages from
userspace into the kernel.
> * Look at our existing audit records to determine which records should have
> namespace and container ID tokens added. We may only want to add the
> additional fields in the case where the namespace/container ID tokens are not
> the init namespace.
If we have a record that ties a set of namespace IDs with a container
ID, then I expect we only need to list the containerID along with auid
and sessionID.
> Can we all live with this? If not, please suggest some alternate ideas;
> simply shouting "IT'S ALL CRAP!" isn't helpful for anyone ... it may be true,
> but it doesn't help us solve the problem ;)
Thanks Paul.
> paul moore
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-17 7:35 [PATCH V6 00/10] namespaces: log namespaces per task Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 01/10] namespaces: expose ns_entries Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 02/10] proc_ns: define PROC_*_INIT_INO in terms of PROC_DYNAMIC_FIRST Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 03/10] audit: log namespace ID numbers Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 04/10] audit: initialize at subsystem time rather than device time Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 05/10] audit: log creation and deletion of namespace instances Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-05 14:22 ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-05 14:31 ` Aristeu Rozanski
2015-05-05 14:46 ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-05 14:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-05 15:16 ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-12 19:57 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-14 14:57 ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-14 15:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-14 16:21 ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-15 2:03 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-14 19:19 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-15 1:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-15 2:25 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-15 13:17 ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-15 14:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-15 21:01 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-15 2:32 ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2015-05-15 6:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-15 12:38 ` Steve Grubb
2015-05-15 13:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-15 21:05 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-16 9:46 ` Daniel J Walsh
2015-05-16 12:16 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-16 14:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-16 22:49 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-19 13:09 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-19 14:27 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-15 0:48 ` Richard Guy Briggs
[not found] ` <CAA4jN2bgynVTwF+owtXgq06JMLQJpy_qokpD0mAguNYeDxmh1A@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-15 2:11 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-05-15 13:19 ` Daniel J Walsh
2015-05-15 20:42 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-15 20:26 ` Paul Moore
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 06/10] audit: dump namespace IDs for pid on receipt of AUDIT_NS_INFO Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 07/10] sched: add a macro to ref all CLONE_NEW* flags Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-17 15:42 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-17 22:00 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 08/10] fork: audit on creation of new namespace(s) Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 09/10] audit: log on switching namespace (setns) Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-17 7:35 ` [PATCH V6 10/10] audit: emit AUDIT_NS_INFO record with AUDIT_VIRT_CONTROL record Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-21 4:33 ` [PATCH V6 00/10] namespaces: log namespaces per task Eric W. Biederman
2015-04-23 3:07 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-23 20:44 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-24 19:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-04-28 2:05 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2015-04-28 2:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-05-08 14:42 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150515023221.GC965@madcap2.tricolour.ca \
--to=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=arozansk@redhat.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®