mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Minfei Huang <mhuang@redhat.com>
Cc: sjenning@redhat.com, jkosina@suse.cz, vojtech@suse.cz,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] livepatch: Prevent patch inconsistencies if the coming module notifier fails
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:15:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150515151556.GA4259@treble.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431656568-26875-1-git-send-email-mhuang@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:22:48AM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> From: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
> 
> The previous patches can be applied, once the corresponding module is
> loaded. In general, the patch will do relocation (if necessary) and
> obtain/verify function address before we start to enable patch.
> 
> There are three different situations in which the coming module notifier
> can fail:
> 
> 1) relocations are not applied for some reason. In this case kallsyms
> for module symbol is not called at all. The patch is not applied to the
> module. If the user disable and enable patch again, there is possible
> bug in klp_enable_func. If the user specified func->old_addr for some
> function in the module (and he shouldn't do that, but nevertheless) our
> warning would not catch it, ftrace will reject to register the handler
> because of wrong address or will register the handler for wrong address.
> 
> 2) relocations are applied successfully, but kallsyms lookup fails. In
> this case func->old_addr can be correct for all previous lookups, 0 for
> current failed one, and "unspecified" for the rest. If we undergo the
> same scenario as in 1, the behaviour differs for three cases, but the
> patch is not enabled anyway.
> 
> 3) the object is initialized, but klp_enable_object fails in the
> notifier due to possible ftrace error. Since it is improbable that
> ftrace would heal itself in the future, we would get those errors
> everytime the patch is enabled.
> 
> In order to fix above situations, we can make obj->mod to NULL, if the
> coming modified notifier fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>

Thanks!

-- 
Josh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15  2:22 Minfei Huang
2015-05-15 11:53 ` Miroslav Benes
2015-05-15 15:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2015-05-18  9:09 ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150515151556.GA4259@treble.redhat.com \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mnfhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=sjenning@redhat.com \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome