mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
To: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, jkosina@suse.cz, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, wanglong@laoqinren.net,
	peifeiyue@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	morgan.wang@huawei.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	dzickus@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, sasha.levin@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 16/17] x86/nmi: Perform a safe NMI stack trace on all CPUs
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:17:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518141748.GE2632@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431603304-162571-17-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com>

On Thu 2015-05-14 11:35:03, Wang Long wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> commit a9edc88093287183ac934be44f295f183b2c62dd upstream.
> 
> When trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() is called on x86, it will trigger an
> NMI on each CPU and call show_regs(). But this can lead to a hard lock
> up if the NMI comes in on another printk().
> 
> In order to avoid this, when the NMI triggers, it switches the printk
> routine for that CPU to call a NMI safe printk function that records the
> printk in a per_cpu seq_buf descriptor. After all NMIs have finished
> recording its data, the seq_bufs are printed in a safe context.
> 
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20140619213952.360076309@goodmis.org
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141115050605.055232587@goodmis.org
> 
> Tested-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
> [wanglong: backport to 3.10 stable
> - adjust context
> ]
> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> index a698d71..1eb5f90 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/nmi.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/seq_buf.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
>  u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh)
> @@ -29,12 +30,33 @@ u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh)
>  #ifdef arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace
>  /* For reliability, we're prepared to waste bits here. */
>  static DECLARE_BITMAP(backtrace_mask, NR_CPUS) __read_mostly;
> +static cpumask_var_t printtrace_mask;
> +
> +#define NMI_BUF_SIZE           4096

Please, replace spaces with tabs.

In fact, the indentation is broken in this whole patch.

The content looks fine, though.

Best Regards,
Petr

> +
> +struct nmi_seq_buf {
> +       unsigned char           buffer[NMI_BUF_SIZE];
> +       struct seq_buf          seq;
> +};
> +
> +/* Safe printing in NMI context */
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct nmi_seq_buf, nmi_print_seq);
>  
>  /* "in progress" flag of arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace */
>  static unsigned long backtrace_flag;
>  
> +static void print_seq_line(struct nmi_seq_buf *s, int start, int end)
> +{
> +       const char *buf = s->buffer + start;
> +
> +       printk("%.*s", (end - start) + 1, buf);

Also th

> +}
> +
>  void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
>  {
> +	struct nmi_seq_buf *s;
> +	int len;
> +	int cpu;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	if (test_and_set_bit(0, &backtrace_flag))
> @@ -45,6 +67,15 @@ void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
>  		return;
>  
>  	cpumask_copy(to_cpumask(backtrace_mask), cpu_online_mask);
> +	cpumask_copy(printtrace_mask, to_cpumask(backtrace_mask));
> +	/*
> +	 * Set up per_cpu seq_buf buffers that the NMIs running on the other
> +	 * CPUs will write to.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(backtrace_mask)) {
> +	        s = &per_cpu(nmi_print_seq, cpu);
> +	        seq_buf_init(&s->seq, s->buffer, NMI_BUF_SIZE);


> +	}
>  
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "sending NMI to all CPUs:\n");
>  	apic->send_IPI_all(NMI_VECTOR);
> @@ -56,10 +87,57 @@ void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(void)
>  		mdelay(1);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Now that all the NMIs have triggered, we can dump out their
> +	 * back traces safely to the console.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, printtrace_mask) {
> +	        int last_i = 0;
> +
> +	        s = &per_cpu(nmi_print_seq, cpu);
> +	        len = seq_buf_used(&s->seq);
> +	        if (!len)
> +	                continue;
> +
> +	        /* Print line by line. */
> +	        for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> +	                if (s->buffer[i] == '\n') {
> +	                        print_seq_line(s, last_i, i);
> +	                        last_i = i + 1;
> +	                }
> +	        }
> +	        /* Check if there was a partial line. */
> +	        if (last_i < len) {
> +	                print_seq_line(s, last_i, len - 1);
> +	                pr_cont("\n");
> +	        }

Same here.

> +	}
> +
>  	clear_bit(0, &backtrace_flag);
>  	smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * It is not safe to call printk() directly from NMI handlers.
> + * It may be fine if the NMI detected a lock up and we have no choice
> + * but to do so, but doing a NMI on all other CPUs to get a back trace
> + * can be done with a sysrq-l. We don't want that to lock up, which
> + * can happen if the NMI interrupts a printk in progress.
> + *
> + * Instead, we redirect the vprintk() to this nmi_vprintk() that writes
> + * the content into a per cpu seq_buf buffer. Then when the NMIs are
> + * all done, we can safely dump the contents of the seq_buf to a printk()
> + * from a non NMI context.
> + */
> +static int nmi_vprintk(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> +{
> +       struct nmi_seq_buf *s = this_cpu_ptr(&nmi_print_seq);
> +       unsigned int len = seq_buf_used(&s->seq);
> +
> +       seq_buf_vprintf(&s->seq, fmt, args);
> +       return seq_buf_used(&s->seq) - len;
> +}
> +
>  static int __kprobes
>  arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler(unsigned int cmd, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> @@ -68,12 +146,14 @@ arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler(unsigned int cmd, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
>  	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(backtrace_mask))) {
> -		static arch_spinlock_t lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
> +		printk_func_t printk_func_save = this_cpu_read(printk_func);
>  
> -		arch_spin_lock(&lock);
> +		/* Replace printk to write into the NMI seq */
> +		this_cpu_write(printk_func, nmi_vprintk);
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING "NMI backtrace for cpu %d\n", cpu);
>  		show_regs(regs);
> -		arch_spin_unlock(&lock);
> +		this_cpu_write(printk_func, printk_func_save);
> +
>  		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(backtrace_mask));
>  		return NMI_HANDLED;
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.8.3.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-18 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-14 11:34 [RFC PATCH 00/17][request for stable 3.10 inclusion] x86/nmi: Print all cpu stacks from NMI safely Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 01/17] tracing: Create seq_buf layer in trace_seq Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 02/17] tracing: Convert seq_buf_path() to be like seq_path() Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 03/17] tracing: Convert seq_buf fields to be like seq_file fields Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 04/17] tracing: Add a seq_buf_clear() helper and clear len and readpos in init Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 05/17] seq_buf: Create seq_buf_used() to find out how much was written Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 06/17] tracing: Use trace_seq_used() and seq_buf_used() instead of len Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 07/17] seq_buf: Add seq_buf_can_fit() helper function Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 08/17] tracing: Have seq_buf use full buffer Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 09/17] tracing: Add seq_buf_get_buf() and seq_buf_commit() helper functions Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 10/17] seq-buf: Make seq_buf_bprintf() conditional on CONFIG_BINARY_PRINTF Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 11/17] seq_buf: Move the seq_buf code to lib/ Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 12/17] seq_buf: Fix seq_buf_vprintf() truncation Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH 13/17] seq_buf: Fix seq_buf_bprintf() truncation Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH 14/17] printk: Add per_cpu printk func to allow printk to be diverted Wang Long
2015-05-18 13:56   ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-14 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH 15/17] printk/percpu: Define printk_func when printk is not defined Wang Long
2015-05-14 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH 16/17] x86/nmi: Perform a safe NMI stack trace on all CPUs Wang Long
2015-05-18 14:17   ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2015-05-19  8:56     ` long.wanglong
2015-05-14 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH 17/17] x86/nmi: Fix use of unallocated cpumask_var_t Wang Long
2015-05-14 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 00/17][request for stable 3.10 inclusion] x86/nmi: Print all cpu stacks from NMI safely Steven Rostedt
2015-05-18  3:52   ` long.wanglong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150518141748.GE2632@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=long.wanglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=morgan.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peifeiyue@huawei.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wanglong@laoqinren.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome