From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755439AbbESKib (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 06:38:31 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:46947 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752292AbbESKi2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 06:38:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:38:08 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Johan Hovold Cc: Lee Jones , Support Opensource , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Milo Kim , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Fabio Estevam , Marek Szyprowski , stable Message-ID: <20150519103808.GE2761@sirena.org.uk> References: <20150513165419.GF19543@x1> <20150513172936.GE2761@sirena.org.uk> <20150514071943.GA20358@x1> <20150515144739.GC13976@localhost> <20150518091049.GN22418@x1> <20150518095159.GB28127@localhost> <20150518162405.GA2761@sirena.org.uk> <20150518164630.GL28127@localhost> <20150518184654.GC2761@sirena.org.uk> <20150519100103.GM28127@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5SR535opHDmk1Ddx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150519100103.GM28127@localhost> X-Cookie: 13. ... r-q1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --5SR535opHDmk1Ddx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:01:03PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > I might have read too much into that response, but the pings were hardly > contentless (they all included the commit message and some the full patch). It's the new content that is important here - if it boils down to "have you looked at this yet" that's not really adding anything and if it's a patch to be applied then it really needs to not be quoted. --5SR535opHDmk1Ddx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVWxKPAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQqDoH/2FoebFo6ULoq8V6xTRAr/ym 9kR0DFc064sTRaxnaI5IhI/wK/emgOVClBlTSC9CTwbR/YOIoM81eC4vqYBTZCFG ppA4B0mz74LzC+av1eF3+MYeVpoai9MYLS+6HRup3q3WJgcKzbZ7zMxRGirpEUDr xK4lpO2UncXI26YTEFs/p36qJBN78NafSdxmofhY+BQP95xUGtaari+8BjDScHEs TMzCIYJyPKi+ZykfgvwAwhD3M328hHUtma0trbnZDdgatj8IEf8c4hVMMpIJ0L5P HNGCpvO7kpgWqdk3AL3d5JTdS0KvKi4dy/RNgdGrSOMknJOHqArE3YkQ3uP0O4c= =xxTD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5SR535opHDmk1Ddx--