mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>,
	Maria Dimakopoulou <maria.n.dimakopoulou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf,x86: Fix event/group validation
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:09:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150521130952.GQ3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBTFPRwHX8zKERYFrMBVQor5GJcDd4ZcKt8WL-tjbJdzLw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:07:20AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:35:02AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> > Commit e979121b1b15 ("perf/x86/intel: Implement cross-HT corruption
> >> > bug workaround") made the situation much worse by actually setting the
> >> > event->hw.constraint value to NULL, so when validation and actual
> >> > scheduling interact we get NULL ptr derefs.
> >> >
> >>
> >> But  x86_schedule_events() does reset the hw.constraint for each invocation:
> >>
> >>            c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(cpuc, i, cpuc->event_list[i]);
> >>            hwc->constraint = c;
> >
> > Yes, so if you have:
> >
> >         validate_group()
> >
> >                 hwc->constraint = c;
> >
> Ok, you get that because validate_group() invokes x6_schedule_events() but
> on the fake_cpuc. This on fake_cpuc->event_list[]->hwc.
> 
> >         <context switch>
> >
> >                 c = hwc->constraint;
> >
> > The second c might not be the first.
> And where does this assignment come from?

That's a read. The <context switch> can include a call to
x86_schedule_events().

> For actual scheduling, we are using the actual cpuc, not fake_cpuc.
> Validate_group() does not modify global cpuc state. Or am I missing
> something?

No, but x86_schedule_event() can modify event state, which is the fail.



  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-21 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21 11:17 [PATCH 00/10] Various x86 pmu scheduling patches Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf,x86: Fix event/group validation Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 12:35   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 12:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 13:07       ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 13:09         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-05-21 13:18           ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 13:20             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 13:27               ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 13:29                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 13:36                   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 14:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 15:11                       ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22  6:49                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-22  9:26                           ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22  9:46                             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-21 14:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 15:42     ` Stephane Eranian
2015-08-21 20:31   ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-10  4:48     ` Sasha Levin
2015-09-10  8:54     ` Stephane Eranian
2015-09-10 10:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf/x86: Improve HT workaround GP counter constraint Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 10:04   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 11:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 11:24       ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 11:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 12:35         ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 12:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 12:55             ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 12:59               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:05                 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 13:07                   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 13:25                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:29                       ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 13:36                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:40                           ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-22 13:48                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-23  8:26                               ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-22 13:25                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-22 13:10                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf/x86: Correct local vs remote sibling state Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 13:31   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 14:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf/x86: Use lockdep Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf/x86: Simplify dynamic constraint code somewhat Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf/x86: Make WARNs consistent Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf/x86: Move intel_commit_scheduling() Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf/x86: Remove pointless tests Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 13:24   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf/x86: Remove intel_excl_states::init_state Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 13:39   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf,x86: Simplify logic Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-21 11:48 ` [PATCH 00/10] Various x86 pmu scheduling patches Stephane Eranian
2015-05-21 12:53   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150521130952.GQ3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ahh@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maria.n.dimakopoulou@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome