mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>,
	stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	support.opensource@diasemi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andreas Ruprecht <andreas.ruprecht@fau.de>,
	hengelein Stefan <stefan.hengelein@fau.de>
Subject: Re: regulator: da9062: undefined Kconfig option MFD_DA9062
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 11:12:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150522101219.GT21577@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432288344.27695.86.camel@x220>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1417 bytes --]

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:52:24AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 10:35 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > Is there a patch queued somewhere to add the missing Kconfig option?

> > This is totally normal for merging MFDs where the MFD goes in via the
> > MFD tree and the subsystem drivers go in via their trees.  This way
> > subsystem maintainers don't have to sit through endless resends of the
> > core driver.

> So every time a driver is added to linux-next that depends on an unknown
> symbol a boring message like this will be sent. And people can simply
> respond to it with a link to the patch that adds the missing symbol. 

> It's a bit annoying. But it helps in catching errors as early as
> possible. And it gives the people looking into these kconfig oddities
> the info they need to keep track of things.

For the common cases like new things being added over multiple trees I
would expect people to be making some effort to filter these things
before reporting manually - for example here a couple of moments of
searching would have shown the rest of the series under review, or most
likely waiting a few weeks before reporting would allow the MFD to get
merged.

One effect of being too keen to report things is that a high false
positive rate will cause people to pay less attention, if the source is
usually just generating noise then it gets tuned out.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-22 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22  8:20 Valentin Rothberg
2015-05-22  8:57 ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-26 10:37   ` Lee Jones
2015-05-27  7:19     ` Opensource [Steve Twiss]
2015-05-22  9:35 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-22  9:52   ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-22 10:12     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2015-05-22 10:53       ` Valentin Rothberg
2015-05-22 13:07         ` Mark Brown
2015-05-22 14:03           ` Paul Bolle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150522101219.GT21577@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreas.ruprecht@fau.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=stefan.hengelein@fau.de \
    --cc=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=support.opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®