Re: [PATCH] kernel:ptrace - Fix typo in comment in function __ptrace_unlink().

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

So this "fix" is wrong.

But you know, even if it was correct... IMO, the fixes like this can
only make sense as a "while at it" part of the meaningful change.

On 05/23, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/ptrace.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
> index c8e0e05..46249f9 100644
> --- a/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ void __ptrace_unlink(struct task_struct *child)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If transition to TASK_STOPPED is pending or in TASK_TRACED, kick
> -	 * @child in the butt.  Note that @resume should be used iff @child
> +	 * @child in the butt.  Note that @resume should be used if @child
>  	 * is in TASK_TRACED; otherwise, we might unduly disrupt
>  	 * TASK_KILLABLE sleeps.
>  	 */
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>