From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
der.herr@hofr.at, peterz@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 13:43:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150526120214.632757988@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150526114356.609107918@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: oleg_nesterov-2_rcu-create_rcu_sync_infrastructure.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5787 bytes --]
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
It is functionally equivalent to
struct rcu_sync_struct {
atomic_t counter;
};
static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
{
return atomic_read(&rss->counter) == 0;
}
static inline void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
{
atomic_inc(&rss->counter);
synchronize_sched();
}
static inline void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
{
synchronize_sched();
atomic_dec(&rss->counter);
}
except: it records the state and synchronize_sched() is only called by
rcu_sync_enter() and only if necessary.
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/rcusync.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/rcu/Makefile | 2
kernel/rcu/sync.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/rcusync.h
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
+#define _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_
+
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+
+struct rcu_sync_struct {
+ int gp_state;
+ int gp_count;
+ wait_queue_head_t gp_wait;
+
+ int cb_state;
+ struct rcu_head cb_head;
+
+ void (*sync)(void);
+ void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
+};
+
+#define ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name) \
+ .gp_state = 0, \
+ .gp_count = 0, \
+ .gp_wait = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.gp_wait), \
+ .cb_state = 0
+
+#define __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
+ ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
+ .sync = synchronize_sched, \
+ .call = call_rcu_sched, \
+}
+
+#define __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
+ ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
+ .sync = synchronize_rcu_bh, \
+ .call = call_rcu_bh, \
+}
+
+#define __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name) { \
+ ___RCU_SYNC_INIT(name), \
+ .sync = synchronize_rcu, \
+ .call = call_rcu, \
+}
+
+#define DEFINE_RCU_SCHED_SYNC(name) \
+ struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SCHED_SYNC_INIT(name)
+
+#define DEFINE_RCU_BH_SYNC(name) \
+ struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_BH_SYNC_INIT(name)
+
+#define DEFINE_RCU_SYNC(name) \
+ struct rcu_sync_struct name = __RCU_SYNC_INIT(name)
+
+static inline bool rcu_sync_is_idle(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
+{
+ return !rss->gp_state; /* GP_IDLE */
+}
+
+enum rcu_sync_type { RCU_SYNC, RCU_SCHED_SYNC, RCU_BH_SYNC };
+
+extern void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *, enum rcu_sync_type);
+extern void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
+extern void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *);
+
+#endif /* _LINUX_RCUSYNC_H_ */
+
--- a/kernel/rcu/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-obj-y += update.o
+obj-y += update.o sync.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SRCU) += srcu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST) += rcutorture.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TREE_RCU) += tree.o
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/rcu/sync.c
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+
+#include <linux/rcusync.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+
+enum { GP_IDLE = 0, GP_PENDING, GP_PASSED };
+enum { CB_IDLE = 0, CB_PENDING, CB_REPLAY };
+
+#define rss_lock gp_wait.lock
+
+void rcu_sync_init(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss, enum rcu_sync_type type)
+{
+ memset(rss, 0, sizeof(*rss));
+ init_waitqueue_head(&rss->gp_wait);
+
+ switch (type) {
+ case RCU_SYNC:
+ rss->sync = synchronize_rcu;
+ rss->call = call_rcu;
+ break;
+
+ case RCU_SCHED_SYNC:
+ rss->sync = synchronize_sched;
+ rss->call = call_rcu_sched;
+ break;
+
+ case RCU_BH_SYNC:
+ rss->sync = synchronize_rcu_bh;
+ rss->call = call_rcu_bh;
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
+{
+ bool need_wait, need_sync;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
+ need_wait = rss->gp_count++;
+ need_sync = rss->gp_state == GP_IDLE;
+ if (need_sync)
+ rss->gp_state = GP_PENDING;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
+
+ BUG_ON(need_wait && need_sync);
+
+ if (need_sync) {
+ rss->sync();
+ rss->gp_state = GP_PASSED;
+ wake_up_all(&rss->gp_wait);
+ } else if (need_wait) {
+ wait_event(rss->gp_wait, rss->gp_state == GP_PASSED);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Possible when there's a pending CB from a rcu_sync_exit().
+ * Nobody has yet been allowed the 'fast' path and thus we can
+ * avoid doing any sync(). The callback will get 'dropped'.
+ */
+ BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
+ }
+}
+
+static void rcu_sync_func(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+ struct rcu_sync_struct *rss =
+ container_of(rcu, struct rcu_sync_struct, cb_head);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+
+ BUG_ON(rss->gp_state != GP_PASSED);
+ BUG_ON(rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
+ if (rss->gp_count) {
+ /*
+ * A new rcu_sync_begin() has happened; drop the callback.
+ */
+ rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
+ } else if (rss->cb_state == CB_REPLAY) {
+ /*
+ * A new rcu_sync_exit() has happened; requeue the callback
+ * to catch a later GP.
+ */
+ rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
+ rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * We're at least a GP after rcu_sync_exit(); eveybody will now
+ * have observed the write side critical section. Let 'em rip!.
+ */
+ rss->cb_state = CB_IDLE;
+ rss->gp_state = GP_IDLE;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rss->rss_lock, flags);
+}
+
+void rcu_sync_exit(struct rcu_sync_struct *rss)
+{
+ spin_lock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
+ if (!--rss->gp_count) {
+ if (rss->cb_state == CB_IDLE) {
+ rss->cb_state = CB_PENDING;
+ rss->call(&rss->cb_head, rcu_sync_func);
+ } else if (rss->cb_state == CB_PENDING) {
+ rss->cb_state = CB_REPLAY;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rss->rss_lock);
+}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-26 11:43 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Optimize percpu-rwsem Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-05-30 16:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-30 19:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-30 19:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-31 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-26 11:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] rcusync: Introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] rcusync: Add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] rcusync: Introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 11:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-29 19:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-29 20:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-29 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-30 20:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-16 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-30 17:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-30 20:04 ` ring_buffer_attach && cond_synchronize_rcu (Was: percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce global impact) Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-16 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-16 11:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-16 19:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-19 17:57 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix ring_buffer_attach() RCU sync, again tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 18:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Optimize percpu-rwsem Linus Torvalds
2015-05-26 18:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 18:35 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-26 18:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-05-26 21:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-27 9:28 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-06-05 1:45 ` Al Viro
2015-06-05 21:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-05 22:11 ` Al Viro
2015-06-05 23:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-27 6:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-26 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 19:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 19:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-26 19:54 ` Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150526120214.632757988@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®