From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753672AbbE0QvP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 27 May 2015 12:51:15 -0400
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:33508 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753044AbbE0QvI (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 May 2015 12:51:08 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,506,1427785200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="701099516"
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 09:53:27 -0700
From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>, balbi@ti.com,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] usb: ulpi: ulpi_init should be executed in
 subsys_initcall
Message-ID: <20150527165327.GB1028@psi-dev26.jf.intel.com>
References: <1432691137-2635-1-git-send-email-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20150527023702.GA7038@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150527023702.GA7038@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:37:02PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:45:37AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > Phy drivers and the ulpi interface providers depend on the
> > registration of the ulpi bus.  Ulpi registers the bus in
> > module_init(). This could cause unnecessary probe delays.
> 
> What do you mean by "probe delays"?

I believe he meant the bus users' probe delays. i.e. unnecessary
-EPROBE_DEFER happening on ulpi_drivers in case they're registered
before ulpi bus itself.

Is that correct, Baolu?

Br, David