From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753336AbbFAITm (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 04:19:42 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:48835 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932128AbbFAIT3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 04:19:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:19:24 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mike Galbraith Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , ktkhai@parallels.com Subject: Re: sched_setscheduler() vs idle_balance() race Message-ID: <20150601081924.GR19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1432799032.3237.119.camel@gmail.com> <20150528135355.GK3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1432991306.3395.35.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1432991306.3395.35.camel@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 03:08:26PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Seems trying to make the target invisible to balancing created a new > race: dequeue target, do stuff that may drop rq->lock while it's > dequeued, target sneaks into schedule(), dequeues itself (#2), boom. Aw god yes, duh. Fun little puzzle this. Lemme go think a bit.