From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759644AbbFBSVZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2015 14:21:25 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:39480 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759351AbbFBSVQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2015 14:21:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:20:59 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon , Viresh Kumar , Srinivas Kandagatla , Andy Gross , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, David Collins Message-ID: <20150602182059.GD14071@sirena.org.uk> References: <1433209679-31389-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20150602105328.GJ14071@sirena.org.uk> <20150602175654.GA24349@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FexDM9E/OpjgUmaq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150602175654.GA24349@codeaurora.org> X-Cookie: The end of labor is to gain leisure. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support CPR on MSM8916 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --FexDM9E/OpjgUmaq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:56:54AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/02, Mark Brown wrote: > > These two patches don't seem to be tied to the rest of the series at all > > (they certainly trigger already for some systems). > The series causes these warning to trigger on devices with CPR > and these patches silence them. So it is related, but the patches > aren't necessary for compilation. They should go through the > regulator tree, if that's what you're asking. I wasn't really asking, more saying that they should not have been sent in the same series, especially not a series listing such a complicated set of external dependencies. --FexDM9E/OpjgUmaq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVbfQLAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ6u0H/2oMqMFT2W2mA1UOxtISqtfj +DI8fHN9PO40LPNb6WTTIU3Idji4yIvWup6iGa8tFA1w5Na/xSaRLEuK/rKyAZ+v IML7V0Zc+v5xQDaaed3erqkyKNFBx2v3ZqAJnDHCOCKZsfrIt+30tzk5oTT4cmt6 pzyvAiFV8A6+2zlTt3OZ7m+6wGc3TjJI9QX3Sw4hSmy4EVDV01iGutvx+kbnP2Mz rVd1StJ0NygFDmPNvhboJGcxJmRggNEtsolh6GAcxljP04wOC+A9MN2zzQ+y8o9D EBTtquwiIBCIQERe7b5mH7eh7fP2bh/FKoTsQuDuGBL1IxBzXP/jLakrgMtm/Hg= =LH0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FexDM9E/OpjgUmaq--