mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: linux@horizon.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net,
	tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86, tsc: Allow for high latency in quick_pit_calibrate()
Date: 5 Jun 2015 16:17:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150605201739.20651.qmail@ns.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150605083107.GA29843@gmail.com>

> I'll run your code as well, to make sure it's not something bad in my code.

Here's a modified version that uses less stack space (no need to store
all 64 bits of a timestamp), and captures a window around an RTC periodic
flag edge to explore WTF is going on there.

commit 769eba0b589141edca3541cfb1e30e01b806e5cb
Author: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 4 22:04:19 2015 -0400

    x86, tsc: Add test code.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index a00f35be..00ff0359 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
 #include <asm/nmi.h>
 #include <asm/x86_init.h>
 
+#include <asm/mc146818rtc.h>
+
 unsigned int __read_mostly cpu_khz;	/* TSC clocks / usec, not used here */
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_khz);
 
@@ -533,15 +535,15 @@ static inline int pit_verify_msb(unsigned char val)
 
 static inline int pit_expect_msb(unsigned char val, u64 *tscp, unsigned long *deltap)
 {
-	int count;
-	u64 tsc = 0, prev_tsc = 0;
+	int count = 0;
+	u64 prev_tsc, tsc = 0;
 
-	for (count = 0; count < 50000; count++) {
-		if (!pit_verify_msb(val))
-			break;
+	do {
+		if (++count > 50000)
+			return 0;
 		prev_tsc = tsc;
 		tsc = get_cycles();
-	}
+	} while (pit_verify_msb(val));
 	*deltap = get_cycles() - prev_tsc;
 	*tscp = tsc;
 
@@ -552,6 +554,177 @@ static inline int pit_expect_msb(unsigned char val, u64 *tscp, unsigned long *de
 	return count > 5;
 }
 
+/* Similar, but only a single read.  And returns the number of reads. */
+static inline unsigned
+pit_expect_msb1(unsigned char val, unsigned *tscp, unsigned *deltap)
+{
+	int count = 0;
+	unsigned prev_tsc, tsc = 0;
+
+	do {
+		if (++count > 50000)
+			return 0;
+		prev_tsc = tsc;
+		tsc = (unsigned)get_cycles();
+	} while (inb(0x42) == val);
+	*deltap = (unsigned)get_cycles() - prev_tsc;
+	*tscp = tsc;
+
+	return count;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned
+rtc_wait_bit(unsigned *tscp, unsigned *deltap)
+{
+	int count = 0;
+	unsigned prev_tsc, tsc = 0;
+
+	do {
+		if (++count > 5000)
+			return 0;
+		prev_tsc = tsc;
+		tsc = (unsigned)get_cycles();
+	} while (~inb(RTC_PORT(1)) & RTC_PF);	/* Wait for bit 6 to be set */
+	*deltap = (unsigned)get_cycles() - prev_tsc;
+	*tscp = tsc;
+
+	/*
+	 * We require _some_ success, but the quality control
+	 * will be based on the error terms on the TSC values.
+	 */
+	return count;
+}
+
+#define SAMPLES 64
+
+static void noinline_for_stack
+pit_test(void)
+{
+	unsigned tsc[SAMPLES+1];	/* How long since rpevious edge */
+	unsigned range[SAMPLES+1];	/* Range of uncertainty */
+	unsigned iter[SAMPLES];	/*& Number of iterations for capture */
+	int i, j;
+	unsigned char saved_a, saved_b;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	extern spinlock_t rtc_lock;
+
+	outb(0xb0, 0x43);
+
+	/* Start at 0xffff */
+	outb(0xff, 0x42);
+	outb(0xff, 0x42);
+
+	pit_verify_msb(0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Among the evil non-portable hacks this code does, it exploits
+	 * the fact that x86 is little-endian and allows unaligned stores
+	 * to store 64-bit values into an array of 32-bit values, where
+	 * each one overwrites the high half of the one before.
+	 */
+	if (pit_expect_msb(0xff, (u64 *)tsc, (unsigned long *)range)) {
+		for (i = 1; i < SAMPLES; i++) {
+			if (!pit_expect_msb(0xff - i, (u64 *)(tsc+i), (unsigned long *)(range+i)))
+				break;
+			if (!pit_verify_msb(0xfe - i))
+				break;
+		}
+		printk("** 2-byte PIT timing\n");
+		for (j = 1; j < i; j++)
+			printk("PIT edge delta %7u, range %6u\n",
+				tsc[j] - tsc[j-1], range[j]);
+	}
+
+	/* Try again, with one-byte reads */
+	outb(0xa0, 0x43);
+	outb(0xff, 0x42);	/* Start at 0xff00 */
+
+	/* Wait until we reach 0xfe (should be very fast) */
+	pit_verify_msb(0);
+	for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
+		if (inb(0x42) == 0xfe)
+			break;
+
+	if (i < 1000) {
+		for (i = 0; i < SAMPLES; i++) {
+			iter[i] = pit_expect_msb1(0xfe - i, tsc+i, range+i);
+			if (iter[i] <= 5)
+				break;
+			if (inb(0x42) != 0xfd - i)
+				break;
+		}
+		printk("** 1-byte PIT timing\n");
+		for (j = 1; j < i; j++)
+			printk("PIT edge delta %7u, range %6u, iter %u\n",
+				tsc[j] - tsc[j-1], range[j], iter[j]);
+	}
+
+	/* Once more, with the RTC */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
+
+	lock_cmos_prefix(RTC_REG_C);
+/* This is skanky stuff that requries rewritten RTC locking to do properly */
+	outb(RTC_REG_B, RTC_PORT(0));
+	saved_b = inb(RTC_PORT(1));
+	outb(saved_b & 7, RTC_PORT(1));	/* Clear interrupt enables */
+
+	outb(RTC_REG_A, RTC_PORT(0));
+	saved_a = inb(RTC_PORT(1));
+	outb((saved_a & 0xf0) | 3, RTC_PORT(1));	/* Set 8 kHz rate */
+/* End of skanky stuff */
+
+	outb(RTC_REG_C, RTC_PORT(0));
+	inb(RTC_PORT(1));	/* Clear any pending */
+
+	for (i = 0; i < SAMPLES; i++) {
+		iter[i] = rtc_wait_bit(tsc+i, range+i);
+		if (iter[i] <= 3)
+			break;
+		if (inb(RTC_PORT(1)) & RTC_PF)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	lock_cmos_suffix(RTC_REG_C);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
+
+	printk("** RTC timing\n");
+	for (j = 1; j < i; j++) {
+		printk("RTC edge delta %7u, range %6u, iter %u\n",
+			tsc[j] - tsc[j-1],  range[j], iter[j]);
+	}
+
+	/* Collect different statistics: per-read timing */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags);
+	lock_cmos_prefix(RTC_REG_C);
+	outb(RTC_REG_C, RTC_PORT(0));
+	inb(RTC_PORT(1));	/* Clear any pending */
+
+	/* Capture a series of timestamps straddling a bit change */
+	j = 10000;
+	for (i = 0; i < j; i++) {
+		tsc[i % (unsigned)SAMPLES] = (unsigned)get_cycles();
+		if (inb(RTC_PORT(1)) & RTC_PF && i >= SAMPLES/2 && j < 10000)
+			j = i + SAMPLES/2;
+	}
+
+	/* Restore the RTC state */
+	outb(RTC_REG_A, RTC_PORT(0));
+	outb(saved_a, RTC_PORT(1));
+	outb(RTC_REG_B, RTC_PORT(0));
+	outb(saved_b, RTC_PORT(1));
+
+	lock_cmos_suffix(RTC_REG_C);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc_lock, flags);
+
+	printk("** RTC timing details\n");
+	for (j = 1; j < SAMPLES; j++) {
+		unsigned k = i + j - SAMPLES;
+		printk("RTC sample %3d: %7u%s\n", k,
+			tsc[k % SAMPLES] - tsc[(k-1) % SAMPLES],
+			j == SAMPLES/2 ? " *" : "");
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * How many MSB values do we want to see? We aim for
  * a maximum error rate of 500ppm (in practice the
@@ -570,6 +743,8 @@ static unsigned long quick_pit_calibrate(void)
 	/* Set the Gate high, disable speaker */
 	outb((inb(0x61) & ~0x02) | 0x01, 0x61);
 
+pit_test();
+
 	/*
 	 * Counter 2, mode 0 (one-shot), binary count
 	 *

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-05 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-03  6:27 George Spelvin
2015-06-03 18:29 ` George Spelvin
2015-06-03 18:48   ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-06-03 19:07     ` George Spelvin
2015-06-04 16:38       ` George Spelvin
2015-06-04 16:52         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-04 17:54           ` George Spelvin
2015-06-04 18:07             ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-05  5:52           ` George Spelvin
2015-06-05  6:16             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-05  5:58         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-05  8:24           ` George Spelvin
2015-06-05  8:31             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-05 20:17               ` George Spelvin [this message]
2015-06-06 21:50                 ` George Spelvin
2015-06-09  6:54                   ` [RFC PATCH] Make quick_pit_calibrate more robust George Spelvin
2015-06-09  9:13                     ` Adrian Hunter
2015-06-09  9:54                       ` George Spelvin
2015-06-10  7:08                       ` Discussion: quick_pit_calibrate is slow George Spelvin
2015-06-10  7:30                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-10  8:47                           ` George Spelvin
2015-06-10  9:25                             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-10 15:43                               ` George Spelvin
2015-06-10 15:56                                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-06-10 16:27                                   ` George Spelvin
2015-06-10 18:38                                     ` George Spelvin
2015-06-10 19:30                                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-06-10 22:19                                         ` George Spelvin
2015-06-10  8:13                         ` Adrian Hunter
2015-06-10  8:55                           ` George Spelvin
2015-06-10  9:12                           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-10 16:11                             ` George Spelvin
2015-06-10  7:32                       ` Discussion: quick_pit_calibrate isn't quick George Spelvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-21  7:55 [PATCH RFC] x86, tsc: Allow for high latency in quick_pit_calibrate() Adrian Hunter
2015-06-01  7:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-06-02 13:58   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-02 19:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-02 19:41   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-02 19:43     ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-02 19:58       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-02 20:03         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-02 20:20           ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-02 21:03             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-02 23:38               ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-03  0:21                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-03  0:39                   ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-03  0:58                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-03  3:30                       ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-03  8:13                         ` Adrian Hunter
2015-06-03 13:45                           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-04 11:28                             ` Adrian Hunter
2015-06-03 16:23                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-22 11:21                             ` Adrian Hunter
2015-06-22 13:14                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-06  6:48                                 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-07-06  7:42                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-22 14:12                               ` George Spelvin
2015-06-03  4:20   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-03  6:20     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-03 13:43       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-03 16:47         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-03 17:04           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-03 17:50             ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-06-04 12:32               ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-03 17:06           ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150605201739.20651.qmail@ns.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®