From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jkosina@suse.cz,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] printk: Fixup the nmi printk mess
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:57:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150611095705.GF9409@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150610152917.GI3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed 2015-06-10 17:29:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:31:55PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > If another NMI comes at this point, it will start filling the buffer
> > from the beginning. If it is fast enough, it might override the text
> > that we print above.
>
> How so? If the cmpxchg succeeded and len == 0, we flushed everything and
> are done with it, if another NMI comes in and 'overwrites' it, that's
> fine, right?
Shame on me. Somehow I thought that there was xchg() and not cmpxchg().
> > > +static int vprintk_nmi(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> > > +{
> > > + struct nmi_seq_buf *s = this_cpu_ptr(&nmi_print_seq);
> > > + unsigned int len = seq_buf_used(&s->seq);
> > > +
> > > + irq_work_queue(&s->work);
> > > + seq_buf_vprintf(&s->seq, fmt, args);
>
> No, everything is strictly per cpu.
I do not know why but I expected that irq_work could get proceed on
any CPU. You are right. They are proceed on the same one.
Similar with the other mail. Sigh, I was too fast yesterday. I am
sorry for the noise.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-10 12:55 Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-10 14:31 ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-10 14:57 ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-10 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-10 15:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-10 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-10 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-10 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-10 19:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-11 14:55 ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-12 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-12 14:28 ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-12 15:35 ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-25 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-26 8:06 ` Petr Mladek
2015-06-11 9:57 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2015-06-10 15:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-10 16:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-10 16:19 ` Joe Perches
2015-06-10 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-10 19:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-10 19:39 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150611095705.GF9409@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.cz \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®