[for-next][PATCH 1/3] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong param in module_param

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: 0001-ring-buffer-benchmark-Fix-the-wrong-param-in-module_.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1699 bytes --]

From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>

The {producer|consumer}_{nice|fifo} parameters are integer
type, we should use 'int' as the second param in module_param.

For example(consumer_fifo):
	the default value of consumer_fifo is -1.
   Without this patch:
        # cat /sys/module/ring_buffer_benchmark/parameters/consumer_fifo
        4294967295
   With this patch:
	# cat /sys/module/ring_buffer_benchmark/parameters/consumer_fifo
	-1

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923873-67712-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index 13d945c0d03f..cdff7d3df902 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -46,16 +46,16 @@ static int consumer_nice = MAX_NICE;
 static int producer_fifo = -1;
 static int consumer_fifo = -1;
 
-module_param(producer_nice, uint, 0644);
+module_param(producer_nice, int, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(producer_nice, "nice prio for producer");
 
-module_param(consumer_nice, uint, 0644);
+module_param(consumer_nice, int, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(consumer_nice, "nice prio for consumer");
 
-module_param(producer_fifo, uint, 0644);
+module_param(producer_fifo, int, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(producer_fifo, "fifo prio for producer");
 
-module_param(consumer_fifo, uint, 0644);
+module_param(consumer_fifo, int, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(consumer_fifo, "fifo prio for consumer");
 
 static int read_events;
-- 
2.1.4