From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754255AbbFVQeJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:34:09 -0400 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:46567 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753766AbbFVQd7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 12:33:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:33:55 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Paul Bolle Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE is not implemented Message-ID: <20150622103355.2f6939c8@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <1434723025.2385.144.camel@x220> References: <1434723025.2385.144.camel@x220> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:10:25 +0200 Paul Bolle wrote: > The MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE macro is documented as > Not Yet Implemented > > for over a decade now. It will clearly never be implemented. Remove a > reference to it from a DocBook template. The thing is, there's nearly 200 invocations of this macro in the tree. Taking out the documentation reference just makes those even more mysterious than they already are. I'd favor, instead, either (1) making the document state explicitly that this macro does nothing, or (2) a tree-wide patch simply removing it entirely. jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/