mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Denys Vlasenko" <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] notifiers: Assert that RCU is watching in notify_die
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:36:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150622113649.GB20244@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9b5f7d2525e17192a983a31f2f0d8eeec6c4c74.1434654252.git.luto@kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:08:35PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Low-level arch entries often call notify_die, and it's easy for arch
> code to fail to exit an RCU quiescent state first.  Assert that
> we're not quiescent in notify_die.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/notifier.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/notifier.c b/kernel/notifier.c
> index ae9fc7cc360e..980e4330fb59 100644
> --- a/kernel/notifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/notifier.c
> @@ -544,6 +544,8 @@ int notrace notify_die(enum die_val val, const char *str,
>  		.signr	= sig,
>  
>  	};
> +	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(),
> +			   "notify_die called but RCU thinks we're quiescent");
>  	return atomic_notifier_call_chain(&die_chain, val, &args);
>  }

Ok, we're about to die and we will prepend what would be a more
important splat possibly hinting at the problem is with a lockdep splat.

I think we should do the assertion and make the rcu_lockdep splat come
last I but don't see how to do this easily from all the notify_die()
call sites.

Or am I missing something...?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-22 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-18 19:08 [PATCH v2 00/14] x86: Rewrite exit-to-userspace code Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] uml: Fix do_signal() prototype Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] context_tracking: Add ct_state and CT_WARN_ON Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] notifiers: Assert that RCU is watching in notify_die Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-22 11:36   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-06-22 16:26     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-22 16:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-22 17:03         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-22 17:24           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-22 17:37             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-22 18:15               ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-22 19:48                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-23  8:56         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-23 11:08           ` Borislav Petkov
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] x86: Move C entry and exit code to arch/x86/entry/common.c Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] x86/traps: Assert that we're in CONTEXT_KERNEL in exception entries Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] x86/entry: Add enter_from_user_mode and use it in syscalls Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] x86/entry: Add new, comprehensible entry and exit hooks Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] x86/entry/64: Really create an error-entry-from-usermode code path Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] x86/entry/64: Migrate 64-bit and compat syscalls to new exit hooks Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] x86/asm/entry/64: Save all regs on interrupt entry Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] x86/asm/entry/64: Simplify irq stack pt_regs handling Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] x86/asm/entry/64: Migrate error and interrupt exit work to C Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] x86/entry: Remove exception_enter from trap handlers Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-18 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] x86/entry: Remove SCHEDULE_USER and asm/context-tracking.h Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] x86: Rewrite exit-to-userspace code Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-23  5:32   ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150622113649.GB20244@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®