From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752260AbbFZIdp (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2015 04:33:45 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:40408 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752222AbbFZIde (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2015 04:33:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:33:26 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Ilya Dryomov Cc: Al Viro , Sage Weil , linux-next , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Yan, Zheng" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ceph tree Message-ID: <20150626183326.7287706a@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20150626111755.5f0635bd@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i586-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/jC7ZUGI_7G/TPBggUUzGeCi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/jC7ZUGI_7G/TPBggUUzGeCi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ilya, On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:21:52 +0300 Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > > Sage: that ceph tree commit has no Signed-off-by from its > > committer :-( The same is true for almost all the commits in the ceph > > tree ... and the committer (Ilya) is not listed as a maintainer of that > > tree ... and its on github :-( >=20 > Well, it has Signed-off-by from a person who is listed as a maintainer > of fs/ceph (Zheng). We share the same tree for three components: rbd > (drivers/block/rbd.c), cephfs (fs/ceph) and libceph (net/ceph) which is > used by both rbd and cephfs (we should probably split libceph into its > own MAINTAINERS entry). The volume of commits is not that high and > we prefer to not clutter our 30-40 commits per cycle with a bunch of > merges, so when one of us rebases the committer stamp gets wiped. Then the person who rebases it must add a Signed-off-by line since they are then on the handling path from the author to Linus. > As for github, is that a bad thing? ceph-client.git is certainly not > the only github tree in linux-next. Yeah, it just means that I am a bit more suspicious of things there. You are *not* listed in my contacts for the ceph tree not are you listed in the MAINTAINERS file for that tree. Also the tree listed in MAINTAINERS is: T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client.= git --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Sig_/jC7ZUGI_7G/TPBggUUzGeCi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVjQ5cAAoJEMDTa8Ir7ZwVhisP/j5sXZPkas8kVHO014h9AAt3 zpKFwaFALcxcJa1LVHTOIP+OoFcNpA4c41gPxtTyFrUry0BQWer7aHvBsvklJO/i qFSWKCezk/RqzxN7ETbI46L4mdUCNy39JBpYPkJcRozrSc42w7GsLY8J77ENdFSo mpa3EjVkLU+KDHd5o6pk1RCutUNhn0m3DP3V/hbAXVXt8W3ZKWg4HstZXrfB/hNt 80MkEzBMtUJbPNZiqB6OyOklrF65fT12ne6iFbGTAw6kH7jh/2V15zyY7kmweXvi z/ePcNgqUJ0Ezxk70riUzwWZe+4RYoI7uJVcilZ3ZUrV+oN9Sn1MA8Nf6EEZKnsp uOkFgAmGC0oeSe6dY6yhbZlkc0SFo73qOQI5AfRblUuT78zzq+RBnjukRG/e5VWm XCCmRkb53E+dtnc7UzsrWvdhEoPTpYQQTCG47DEZCLLFtlfjU6PTWZJ0kcGoivVZ CMBOaqSdFvFMizXonn/iW5D3SMbEuXX6n3sQ0Q1xcBFdPO7C8XDZPaX92nuTzQts i2X/oHbfOcIkLk8kBpu00NM8ppDO7buJxFvRaHLZ2w8idEZ/BjyrFQWHqS1ErWNn vAkqmaD0CZdXZLDE3HfKpDcdTBSR01YFcSaHhdP+Bp/IkeRR5OiuB0H/M4POHwhZ fP/4KCeZKLv5lUPsDvy8 =g3EJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jC7ZUGI_7G/TPBggUUzGeCi--