mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Cc: Changman Lee <cm224.lee@samsung.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: refactor shrink flow for extent cache
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:25:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150701012536.GD1496@jaegeuk-mac02.mot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00ea01d0b321$854293d0$8fc7bb70$@samsung.com>

Hi Chao,

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 06:42:09PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> For now, in extent cache, we have a global lru list which links all extent
> node in the cache, and the list is protected by a global spinlock.
> 
> If we want to shrink extent cache, we will:
> 1. delete all target extent node from global lru list under spinlock;
> 2. traverse all per-inode extent tree in global radix tree;
> 	2.a. traverse all extent node in per-inode extent tree, try to free extent
>          node if it is not in global lru list already.
> 
> This method is inefficient when there is huge number of inode extent tree in
> global extent tree.
> 
> In this patch we introduce a new method for extent cache shrinking:
> When we attach a new extent node, we record extent tree pointer in extent node.
> In shrink flow, we can try to find and lock extent tree of inode directly by
> this backward pointer, and then detach the extent node from extent tree.
> 
> This can help to shrink extent cache more efficiently.

Yes, but as we discussed before, this way will consume 4 bytes per each
extent_node. Can it be acceptable?

Instead, IMO, we need to focus on how to increase its hit ratio first.
Actually, I wrote a patch for that.
Could you check that first?

Thanks,

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-01  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-30 10:42 Chao Yu
2015-07-01  1:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2015-07-02 12:37   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150701012536.GD1496@jaegeuk-mac02.mot.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
    --cc=cm224.lee@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®