From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751382AbbGBQsu (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:48:50 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:46998 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752937AbbGBQsm (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:48:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:48:16 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/5] rcu: Short-circuit normal GPs via expedited GPs Message-ID: <20150702164816.GB19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150630214805.GA7795@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1435700910-9104-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1435700910-9104-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150701100521.GP19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150701134143.GY3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150701134806.GF25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150701140313.GD3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150702120329.GO3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150702140617.GG3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150702140617.GG3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:06:17AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Or is your point that RCU_GP_DONE_FQS is a bad name? Perhaps I should > change it to something like RCU_GP_DOING_FQS. Or am I still missing > something here? Yes, that might have been the root of my confusion.