From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, jason@lakedaemon.net,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ACPI / ARM64: add BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:33:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150706103355.GC27723@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15297999.EvgjakjXbx@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 01:54:15AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, July 03, 2015 01:51:36 PM Al Stone wrote:
> > Perhaps the sanity checking for the MADT subtables needs to be revisited
> > and a more general solution provided -- this is not the only MADT subtable
> > with this problem and it may occur again.
> >
> > Even the versions above are not technically compliant with the spec. If
> > we implement what the spec currently says, it might look something like
> > this:
> >
> > #define ACPI_MADT_GICC_LENGTH ({ \
> > u8 length; \
> > switch (ACPI_FADT_SPEC_VERSION) { \
> > case ACPI_FADT_SPEC_VERSION_5_0: \
> > length = 40; \
> > break; \
> > case ACPI_FADT_SPEC_VERSION_5_1: \
> > length = 76; \
> > break; \
> > default: /* use 6.0 size */ \
> > length = 80; \
> > } \
> > length; \
> > })
> >
> > So it's just messy and there will be a need for change. Let me think about
> > making this a function instead of a macro; it may make sense to really fix
> > BAD_MADT_ENTRY in general instead of just dealing with the GICC subtable,
> > but it could also be overkill.
>
> So here's my suggestion.
>
> First, make ARM64 boot with 4.2+ in the simplest way possible.
>
> Second, set out to fix BAD_MADT_ENTRY() etc. Start with fixing ACPICA to
> distinguish between the different formats depending on the spec version and
> follow up from there.
That's fine by me (as long as there is a plan to fix it properly,
ideally in 4.3).
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-06 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-02 23:48 [PATCH v3 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries Al Stone
2015-07-02 23:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ACPI : introduce macros for using the ACPI specification version Al Stone
2015-07-03 0:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-03 5:23 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-03 19:22 ` Al Stone
2015-07-03 23:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-06 21:53 ` Al Stone
2015-07-06 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-03 5:16 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-03 19:32 ` Al Stone
2015-07-02 23:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ACPI / ARM64: add BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY() macro Al Stone
2015-07-03 14:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-03 19:51 ` Al Stone
2015-07-03 23:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-06 10:33 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2015-07-06 21:20 ` Al Stone
2015-07-02 23:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ACPI / ARM64 : use the new BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY macro Al Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150706103355.GC27723@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®