From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757267AbbGGMvg (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2015 08:51:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:33015 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756758AbbGGMv2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2015 08:51:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:51:23 +0200 From: Anton Arapov To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ananth Mavinakayanahalli , David Long , Denys Vlasenko , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Ingo Molnar , Jan Willeke , Jim Keniston , Mark Wielaard , Pratyush Anand , Srikar Dronamraju , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Message-ID: <20150707125123.GC5946@troglodyte.intinfra.com> References: <20150707012210.GA7466@redhat.com> <20150707012243.GA7500@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150707012243.GA7500@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:22:43AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > 1. It doesn't make sense to continue if handle_trampoline() fails, > change handle_swbp() to always return after this call. > > 2. Turn pr_warn() into uprobe_warn(), and change handle_trampoline() > to send SIGILL on failure. It is pointless to return to user mode > with the corrupted instruction_pointer() which we can't restore. > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov > Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju Acked-by: Anton Arapov > --- > kernel/events/uprobes.c | 21 ++++++++++----------- > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c > index d8c702f..eabdc21 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c > @@ -1770,7 +1770,7 @@ handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs) > up_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem); > } > > -static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs) > +static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > struct uprobe_task *utask; > struct return_instance *ri; > @@ -1778,11 +1778,11 @@ static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs) > > utask = current->utask; > if (!utask) > - return false; > + goto sigill; > > ri = utask->return_instances; > if (!ri) > - return false; > + goto sigill; > > /* > * TODO: we should throw out return_instance's invalidated by > @@ -1804,8 +1804,12 @@ static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs) > } > > utask->return_instances = ri; > + return; > + > + sigill: > + uprobe_warn(current, "handle uretprobe, sending SIGILL."); > + force_sig_info(SIGILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, current); > > - return true; > } > > bool __weak arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs) > @@ -1824,13 +1828,8 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs) > int uninitialized_var(is_swbp); > > bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs); > - if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr()) { > - if (handle_trampoline(regs)) > - return; > - > - pr_warn("uprobe: unable to handle uretprobe pid/tgid=%d/%d\n", > - current->pid, current->tgid); > - } > + if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr()) > + return handle_trampoline(regs); > > uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp); > if (!uprobe) { > -- > 1.5.5.1 >