mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] change sb_writers to use percpu_rw_semaphore
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:25:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713212559.GA13886@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150713212536.GA13855@redhat.com>

__sb_start/end_write() can use percpu_down/up_read().
---
 fs/super.c         |  135 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 include/linux/fs.h |   14 +----
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 94303fc..6e336b8 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static void destroy_super(struct super_block *s)
 	list_lru_destroy(&s->s_dentry_lru);
 	list_lru_destroy(&s->s_inode_lru);
 	for (i = 0; i < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; i++)
-		percpu_counter_destroy(&s->s_writers.counter[i]);
+		percpu_free_rwsem(s->s_writers.rw_sem + i);
 	security_sb_free(s);
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&s->s_mounts));
 	kfree(s->s_subtype);
@@ -178,14 +178,10 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags)
 		goto fail;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; i++) {
-		if (percpu_counter_init(&s->s_writers.counter[i], 0,
-					GFP_KERNEL) < 0)
-			goto fail;
-		lockdep_init_map(&s->s_writers.lock_map[i], sb_writers_name[i],
-				 &type->s_writers_key[i], 0);
+		__percpu_init_rwsem(&s->s_writers.rw_sem[i],
+					sb_writers_name[i],
+					&type->s_writers_key[i]);
 	}
-	init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_writers.wait);
-	init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_writers.wait_unfrozen);
 	s->s_bdi = &noop_backing_dev_info;
 	s->s_flags = flags;
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&s->s_instances);
@@ -1146,43 +1142,10 @@ out:
  */
 void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
 {
-	percpu_counter_dec(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]);
-	/*
-	 * Make sure s_writers are updated before we wake up waiters in
-	 * freeze_super().
-	 */
-	smp_mb();
-	if (waitqueue_active(&sb->s_writers.wait))
-		wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait);
-	rwsem_release(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 1, _RET_IP_);
+	percpu_up_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_end_write);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-/*
- * We want lockdep to tell us about possible deadlocks with freezing but
- * it's it bit tricky to properly instrument it. Getting a freeze protection
- * works as getting a read lock but there are subtle problems. XFS for example
- * gets freeze protection on internal level twice in some cases, which is OK
- * only because we already hold a freeze protection also on higher level. Due
- * to these cases we have to tell lockdep we are doing trylock when we
- * already hold a freeze protection for a higher freeze level.
- */
-static void acquire_freeze_lock(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool trylock,
-				unsigned long ip)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	if (!trylock) {
-		for (i = 0; i < level - 1; i++)
-			if (lock_is_held(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[i])) {
-				trylock = true;
-				break;
-			}
-	}
-	rwsem_acquire_read(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 0, trylock, ip);
-}
-#endif
 
 /*
  * This is an internal function, please use sb_start_{write,pagefault,intwrite}
@@ -1190,27 +1153,15 @@ static void acquire_freeze_lock(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool trylock,
  */
 int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool wait)
 {
-retry:
-	if (unlikely(sb->s_writers.frozen >= level)) {
-		if (!wait)
-			return 0;
-		wait_event(sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen,
-			   sb->s_writers.frozen < level);
-	}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-	acquire_freeze_lock(sb, level, !wait, _RET_IP_);
-#endif
-	percpu_counter_inc(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]);
 	/*
-	 * Make sure counter is updated before we check for frozen.
-	 * freeze_super() first sets frozen and then checks the counter.
+	 * !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+	 * !!!!!!!!! percpu_down_read_trylock() wasn't merged yet !!!!!!!!!!!!!
+	 * !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 	 */
-	smp_mb();
-	if (unlikely(sb->s_writers.frozen >= level)) {
-		__sb_end_write(sb, level);
-		goto retry;
-	}
+	if (!wait)
+		return 0;
+
+	percpu_down_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
 	return 1;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_start_write);
@@ -1227,42 +1178,46 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sb_start_write);
  */
 static void sb_wait_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
 {
-	s64 writers;
-
-	rwsem_acquire(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
-
-	do {
-		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-
-		/*
-		 * We use a barrier in prepare_to_wait() to separate setting
-		 * of frozen and checking of the counter
-		 */
-		prepare_to_wait(&sb->s_writers.wait, &wait,
-				TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-
-		writers = percpu_counter_sum(&sb->s_writers.counter[level-1]);
-		if (writers)
-			schedule();
-
-		finish_wait(&sb->s_writers.wait, &wait);
-	} while (writers);
+	percpu_down_write(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
 }
 
+/*
+ * !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ * !!!!!!!!!!! Move this code into kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ * !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ */
+#include "../kernel/locking/rwsem.h"
 /* Avoid the warning from lockdep_sys_exit() */
 static void sb_lockdep_release(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	int level;
+	struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem;
+
+	for (level = 0; level < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; ++level) {
+		sem = sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level;
+		rwsem_clear_owner(&sem->rw_sem);
+		rwsem_release(&sem->rw_sem.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
+	}
+}
+
+static void sb_lockdep_acquire(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	int level;
+	struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem;
 
 	for (level = 0; level < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; ++level) {
-		rwsem_release(&sb->s_writers.lock_map[level-1], 1, _THIS_IP_);
+		sem = sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level;
+		rwsem_set_owner(&sem->rw_sem); /* unneeded */
+		rwsem_acquire(&sem->rw_sem.dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
 	}
 }
 
 static void sb_unlock_frozen(struct super_block *sb)
 {
-	smp_wmb();
-	wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen);
+	int level;
+
+	for (level = 0; level < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; ++level)
+		percpu_up_write(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1323,8 +1278,6 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb)
 
 	/* From now on, no new normal writers can start */
 	sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_WRITE;
-	smp_wmb();
-
 	/* Release s_umount to preserve sb_start_write -> s_umount ordering */
 	up_write(&sb->s_umount);
 
@@ -1332,9 +1285,8 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb)
 
 	/* Now we go and block page faults... */
 	down_write(&sb->s_umount);
-	sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT;
-	smp_wmb();
 
+	sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT;
 	sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT);
 
 	/* All writers are done so after syncing there won't be dirty data */
@@ -1342,7 +1294,6 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb)
 
 	/* Now wait for internal filesystem counter */
 	sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_FS;
-	smp_wmb();
 	sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS);
 
 	if (sb->s_op->freeze_fs) {
@@ -1350,8 +1301,8 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb)
 		if (ret) {
 			printk(KERN_ERR
 				"VFS:Filesystem freeze failed\n");
-			sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_UNFROZEN;
 			sb_unlock_frozen(sb);
+			sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_UNFROZEN;
 			deactivate_locked_super(sb);
 			return ret;
 		}
@@ -1386,6 +1337,8 @@ int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb)
 	if (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
 		goto out;
 
+	sb_lockdep_acquire(sb);
+
 	if (sb->s_op->unfreeze_fs) {
 		error = sb->s_op->unfreeze_fs(sb);
 		if (error) {
@@ -1396,9 +1349,9 @@ int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb)
 		}
 	}
 
+	sb_unlock_frozen(sb);
 out:
 	sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_UNFROZEN;
-	sb_unlock_frozen(sb);
 	deactivate_locked_super(sb);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 35ec87e..314e2d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 #ifndef _LINUX_FS_H
 #define _LINUX_FS_H
 
-
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/kdev_t.h>
@@ -30,6 +29,7 @@
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 #include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/blk_types.h>
+#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
 
 #include <asm/byteorder.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/fs.h>
@@ -1246,16 +1246,8 @@ enum {
 #define SB_FREEZE_LEVELS (SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE - 1)
 
 struct sb_writers {
-	/* Counters for counting writers at each level */
-	struct percpu_counter	counter[SB_FREEZE_LEVELS];
-	wait_queue_head_t	wait;		/* queue for waiting for
-						   writers / faults to finish */
-	int			frozen;		/* Is sb frozen? */
-	wait_queue_head_t	wait_unfrozen;	/* queue for waiting for
-						   sb to be thawed */
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-	struct lockdep_map	lock_map[SB_FREEZE_LEVELS];
-#endif
+	int				frozen;		/* Is sb frozen? */
+	struct percpu_rw_semaphore	rw_sem[SB_FREEZE_LEVELS];
 };
 
 struct super_block {
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-13 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 21:25 [PATCH RFC 0/4] " Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-13 21:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] change get_super_thawed() to use sb_start/end_write() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-14 10:49   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-14 13:38     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-13 21:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] introduce sb_unlock_frozen() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-13 21:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] introduce sb_lockdep_release() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-13 21:25 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-07-13 22:23 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] change sb_writers to use percpu_rw_semaphore Dave Chinner
2015-07-13 22:42   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-13 23:14     ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-14 10:48 ` Jan Kara
2015-07-14 13:37   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-14 21:17     ` Dave Hansen
2015-07-14 21:22       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-14 21:41         ` Dave Hansen
2015-07-15  6:47           ` Jan Kara
2015-07-15 18:19             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-16  7:26               ` Jan Kara
2015-07-16  7:30                 ` Dave Hansen
2015-07-16  8:55                   ` Jan Kara
2015-07-16 17:32                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-17  1:27                   ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-17 17:31                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-17 22:40                       ` Dave Chinner
2015-07-20  8:26                         ` Jan Kara
2015-07-22 21:09                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-20 16:23                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-22 21:15 [PATCH " Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-22 21:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] " Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-22 21:34   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-28  8:34   ` Jan Kara
2015-08-03 17:30     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-07 19:54   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150713212559.GA13886@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome