From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752963AbbGNJOM (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:14:12 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:32882 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751277AbbGNJOL (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:14:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:14:06 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Ray Jui Cc: Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , Bjorn Helgaas , Hauke Mehrtens , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: Add Broadcom's North Star 2 support Message-ID: <20150714091406.GC13555@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1436837955-26279-1-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com> <1436837955-26279-4-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1436837955-26279-4-git-send-email-rjui@broadcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 06:39:14PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: > This patch adds support to Broadcom's North Star 2 SoC in the arm64 > Kconfig and defconfig files > > Signed-off-by: Ray Jui > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index 318175f..6c5c279 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -162,6 +162,18 @@ source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer" > > menu "Platform selection" > > +config ARCH_BCM_IPROC > + bool > + help > + This enables support for Broadcom iProc based SoCs > + > +config ARCH_BCM_NS2 > + bool "Broadcom North Start 2 (BCM5871X)" > + select ARCH_BCM_IPROC > + help > + This enables support for Broadcom NS2 (BCM5871X). NS2 is in > + the iProc family of SoCs based on the ARMv8 architecture Do you really need the second config option? Just leave the one covering the family as we do for most of the other family SoCs on arm64 (apart from ARCH_TEGRA_123_SOC which I plan to remove and use ARCH_TEGRA instead). -- Catalin