From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752095AbbGONUT (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:20:19 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39153 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751598AbbGONUS (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:20:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:20:14 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Olof Johansson Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Split out platform options to separate Kconfig Message-ID: <20150715132014.GE20186@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1436958621-23524-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1436958621-23524-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:10:21AM -0400, Olof Johansson wrote: > Let's move out the platform Kconfig entries to a separate file, since these > changes usually get moved through arm-soc instead of the arm64 arch tree, and > this will lead to fewer conflicts > > Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson > --- > > Will, Catalin, I'll merge this through arm-soc if I get your acks. Thanks! That's fine by me. Acked-by: Catalin Marinas > +config ARCH_TEGRA > + bool "NVIDIA Tegra SoC Family" > + select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER > + select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB > + select CLKDEV_LOOKUP > + select CLKSRC_MMIO > + select CLKSRC_OF > + select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS > + select HAVE_CLK > + select PINCTRL > + select RESET_CONTROLLER > + help > + This enables support for the NVIDIA Tegra SoC family. > + > +config ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC > + bool "NVIDIA Tegra132 SoC" > + depends on ARCH_TEGRA > + select PINCTRL_TEGRA124 > + select USB_ULPI if USB_PHY > + select USB_ULPI_VIEWPORT if USB_PHY > + help > + Enable support for NVIDIA Tegra132 SoC, based on the Denver > + ARMv8 CPU. The Tegra132 SoC is similar to the Tegra124 SoC, > + but contains an NVIDIA Denver CPU complex in place of > + Tegra124's "4+1" Cortex-A15 CPU complex. Also, please make sure we won't get any more Kconfig entries for SoC variations on arm64 (still waiting for the Tegra folk to remove ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC; this seems to be one of the very few SoCs that use Makefile obj-y tricks to build clock, memory controller drivers instead of dedicated driver Kconfig entries and they aren't even consistent: PINCTRL_TEGRA124). Thanks. -- Catalin