From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756012AbbGPTlF (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:41:05 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:35747 "EHLO mail-yk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751769AbbGPTlC (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:41:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:40:58 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 block/for-4.2/writeback] ext4: implement cgroup writeback support Message-ID: <20150716194058.GZ15934@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1434495193-31182-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20150712180520.GE18734@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150712180520.GE18734@mtj.duckdns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 02:05:20PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Ted, these two patches apply cleanly on top of the current mainline > and thus can be routed either through ext4 or block tree. What do you > think? ping? Thanks. -- tejun