From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: jasonbaron0@gmail.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@amacapital.net,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
liuj97@gmail.com, rabin@rab.in, ralf@linux-mips.org,
ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
michael@ellerman.id.au, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] x86, tsc: Employ static_branch_likely()
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:52:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150724175823.226513471@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150724175209.814173117@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-static-key-use-new.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1878 bytes --]
Because of the static_key restrictions we had to take an unconditional
jump for the most likely case, causing $I bloat.
Rewrite to use the new primitives.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static int __read_mostly tsc_unstable;
erroneous rdtsc usage on !cpu_has_tsc processors */
static int __read_mostly tsc_disabled = -1;
-static struct static_key __use_tsc = STATIC_KEY_INIT;
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(__use_tsc);
int tsc_clocksource_reliable;
@@ -274,7 +274,12 @@ static void set_cyc2ns_scale(unsigned lo
*/
u64 native_sched_clock(void)
{
- u64 tsc_now;
+ if (static_branch_likely(&__use_tsc)) {
+ u64 tsc_now = rdtsc();
+
+ /* return the value in ns */
+ return cycles_2_ns(tsc_now);
+ }
/*
* Fall back to jiffies if there's no TSC available:
@@ -284,16 +289,9 @@ u64 native_sched_clock(void)
* very important for it to be as fast as the platform
* can achieve it. )
*/
- if (!static_key_false(&__use_tsc)) {
- /* No locking but a rare wrong value is not a big deal: */
- return (jiffies_64 - INITIAL_JIFFIES) * (1000000000 / HZ);
- }
-
- /* read the Time Stamp Counter: */
- tsc_now = rdtsc();
- /* return the value in ns */
- return cycles_2_ns(tsc_now);
+ /* No locking but a rare wrong value is not a big deal: */
+ return (jiffies_64 - INITIAL_JIFFIES) * (1000000000 / HZ);
}
/* We need to define a real function for sched_clock, to override the
@@ -1204,7 +1202,7 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
/* now allow native_sched_clock() to use rdtsc */
tsc_disabled = 0;
- static_key_slow_inc(&__use_tsc);
+ static_branch_enable(&__use_tsc);
if (!no_sched_irq_time)
enable_sched_clock_irqtime();
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-24 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-24 17:52 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] jump_label: Another (better) static_key interface Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 17:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] jump_label: Rename JUMP_LABEL_{EN,DIS}ABLE Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 17:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] jump_label: Rename JUMP_LABEL_TYPE_* Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 17:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] jump_label: Add jump_entry_key() helper Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 17:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] jump_label: Add static_key_{en,dis}able() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-24 17:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] jump_label: Rework update logic Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-28 5:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-07-24 17:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] jump_label: Add a new static_key interface Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 9:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 10:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-07-27 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 10:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-07-27 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 14:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-27 10:51 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-07-24 17:52 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150724175823.226513471@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jasonbaron0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®