From: "Timo Sigurdsson" <public_timo.s@silentcreek.de>
To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Cc: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
wens@csie.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:00:06 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150802220006.E5BE06C810BC@dd34104.kasserver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B79FCA.7070907@redhat.com>
Hi Stefan,
you didn't include me in your answer, hence the late reply...
Stefan Monnier schrieb am 29.07.2015 02:02:
>> IMHO for a common maximum opp that's a good approach. But for the lowest
>> frequency setting, it would seem more logical to me, to raise the voltage
>> to a point where all boards will run fine with them, unless those boards
>> cannot handle the frequency regardless of the higher voltage.
> I generally agre, tho IIRC some measurements seem to indicate that the
> lowest frequency settings did not bring much (if any) reduction in power
> consumption, making them rather useless.
That's an interesting point. However, that would be a different discussion. I
wouldn't mind if the 144MHz would be removed - my point was just that if it's
supposed to be a common setting, it should work on all boards. I posted a patch
today to fix this. [1] That might be a good place to discuss whether this
setting should be removed entirely.
Regards,
Timo
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux-sunxi/fIfbdn7mrQA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-02 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 1:28 Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-27 8:07 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2015-07-27 12:09 ` public_timo.s
2015-07-27 12:43 ` Hans de Goede
2015-07-28 9:02 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 12:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-07-28 14:57 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 12:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-07-28 14:24 ` Hans de Goede
2015-07-28 15:09 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 15:29 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-02 22:00 ` Timo Sigurdsson [this message]
2015-07-28 14:45 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-27 12:36 ` public_timo.s
2015-07-27 12:54 ` Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <CAGb2v65ApKvrj6K+kw43u=0q6=auTsmQjCXhibgZkW+vd5nDqA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-07-28 9:02 ` Timo Sigurdsson
2015-07-28 12:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-07-28 15:01 ` Timo Sigurdsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150802220006.E5BE06C810BC@dd34104.kasserver.com \
--to=public_timo.s@silentcreek.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome