From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932108AbbHGN3b (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:29:31 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:33028 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753088AbbHGN3a (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:29:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 14:29:19 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Philipp Zabel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , kernel@pengutronix.de, support.opensource@diasemi.com Message-ID: <20150807132919.GF10301@sirena.org.uk> References: <1438879104-13081-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20150806183322.GF20873@sirena.org.uk> <1438939763.3638.14.camel@pengutronix.de> <20150807123112.GV20873@sirena.org.uk> <1438953696.3638.34.camel@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438953696.3638.34.camel@pengutronix.de> X-Cookie: Biggest security gap -- an open mouth. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 146.198.193.35 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: da9063: Add set_voltage_time_sel function X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 03:21:36PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Freitag, den 07.08.2015, 13:31 +0100 schrieb Mark Brown: > > (or ideally split out the updates to the > > drivers into separate patches). > When splitting the patch, the series either won't be bisectable (core > patch first) or temporarily remove functionality (driver patches first). > What do you suggest? I'd expect to see the core patch first - why would it break bisection? Having the generic operation explicitly specified should still work just as well as if the device specifies the generic function explicitly. --s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVxLKuAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQvrUH/2h22KrE8ehNk7TGjaHg+6Bl GFAnggDmgyb2vdH2vVvZvtFqIO8BQ/gpg++hGNU1dugsyvcP90IdAbcydEsVD12n HQL3bIXG87Cisj703NOW8DsKWZlSuNY+0kpbgm8K7ZINFVGRIIkopOFFKpnb//d2 HyFy+M5SsmKNX+h8jLv8geAZogxgkc0QEJefe2FAaiKE+eWktV84YbqxT+pYIyrB AqVlJglzenEPSlyt5hIgjLLs4r7MCAKKjdXsSRpuY/euLSOgDGhxp2VLNLvfyose y95NWsdm/ZezR5PYMZmJMeDSlOfVa887xbL9rk0feWXvooFj724RSh0Kkg85yps= =IAbD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi--