From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: kan.liang@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf tools: Unset perf_event_attr::freq when period term is set
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:12:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150808171210.GC17040@krava.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150807153843.GD3325@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:38:43PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:44:53PM -0400, kan.liang@intel.com escreveu:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> > Here are some examples and test results.
> >
> > 1. Comparing the elapsed time and perf.data size from "kernbench -M -H".
> >
> > The test command for FULL callgraph and time support.
> > "perf record -e
> > '{cpu/cpu-cycles,period=100000/,cpu/instructions,period=20000/p}'
> > --call-graph fp --time"
>
> Jiri, while testing this I noticed that the message for EINVAL when
> using the cpu// syntax (per-event settings) is cryptic:
>
> [root@zoo ~]# perf record -e 'cpu/cpu-cycles,call-graph=fp,time,period=100000/p' ls
> Error:
> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (cpu/cpu-cycles,call-graph=fp,time,period=100000/p).
> /bin/dmesg may provide additional information.
> No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?
>
> Whereas if we use -F, it is much, much clearer, telling the user exactly
> what is failing and what needs to be done to make it work:
>
> [root@zoo ~]# perf record -F 100000 -e cpu/cpu-cycles/ usleep 1
> Maximum frequency rate (25000) reached.
> Please use -F freq option with lower value or consider
> tweaking /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate.
> [root@zoo ~]#
>
> Hope this is something easy to wire up, given your event parsing kung foo
> skillz...
my kungu foo found there was actually another issue ;-)
we did not clear up attr->freq bit.. so the sample_period
was handled as sample_freq value.. please check the patch
below
anyfoo, now period setup can raise sky high (which is correct)
and once it meets the God it shows:
[jolsa@krava perf]$ ./perf record -e 'cpu/cpu-cycles,call-graph=fp,time,period=1000000000000000000000000/' ls
event syntax error: '..time,period=1000000000000000000000000/'
\___ parser error
I'll check if we could add some default error message when value
crosses the type maximum.. which now falls to parser error
jirka
---
We need to unset 'perf_event_attr::freq' bit (default 1) when
'period' term is specified within event definition like:
-e 'cpu/cpu-cycles,call-graph=fp,time,period=100000'
otherwise it will handle the period value as frequency
(and fail if it crossed the maximum allowed frequency value).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-7f3gjwbekakhyxr47wvin4zb@git.kernel.org
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index d902cad4ce10..4c779d23b1d7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
switch (term->type) {
case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_PERIOD:
attr->sample_period = term->val.period;
+ attr->freq = 0;
break;
case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_TIME:
if (term->val.time)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-08 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-06 19:44 [PATCH RFC V9 1/3] perf,tools: move callchain option parse code to util.c kan.liang
2015-08-06 19:44 ` [PATCH RFC V9 2/3] perf,tools: per-event callgraph support kan.liang
2015-08-07 10:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-08-07 15:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-08-07 15:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-08-08 16:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-08-08 17:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-08-10 13:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-08-10 12:56 ` Liang, Kan
2015-08-10 15:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-08-10 18:57 ` Liang, Kan
2015-08-10 19:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-08-08 17:12 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2015-08-12 12:29 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Unset perf_event_attr:: freq when period term is set tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2015-08-06 19:44 ` [PATCH RFC V9 3/3] perf,tests: Add tests to callgraph and time parse kan.liang
2015-08-07 10:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-08-07 10:51 ` [PATCH] perf tools: Move perf_counts struct and functions into separate object Jiri Olsa
2015-08-07 13:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-08-12 12:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf stat: " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2015-08-12 12:29 ` [tip:perf/core] perf callchain: Move option parsing code to util.c tip-bot for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150808171210.GC17040@krava.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome