From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753534AbbHRPT3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:19:29 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:50826 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752105AbbHRPT0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:19:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:19:19 -0500 From: Felipe Balbi To: "Theodore Ts'o" , Felipe Balbi , Christoph Hellwig , , , Greg KH , , Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0 Message-ID: <20150818151919.GE9143@saruman.tx.rr.com> Reply-To: References: <20150817194502.GC16201@saruman.tx.rr.com> <20150818005437.GA7535@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RpqchZ26BWispMcB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150818005437.GA7535@thunk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --RpqchZ26BWispMcB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 08:54:37PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi Theodore, > >=20 > > as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove > > block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached > > storage devices. > >=20 > > You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in > > b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This > > revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of > > v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS. > >=20 > > Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too > > late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc > > stable would suffice anyway. > >=20 > > In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable > > and v4.2. >=20 > Already done. See the latest version of the dev branch. I noticed > this morning that I needed to mark it for stable, and took care of it. cool, thanks --=20 balbi --RpqchZ26BWispMcB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJV00z3AAoJEIaOsuA1yqREPnoQAI0OLEYU8jJZQlOIQQSU7QG6 AquOGkskaNQdJXNZ482UZmoynBaNaNx5NlY3Kip78MLa68GKbNACe3Og7PtRrZ+f sWjBPJyrh+NYUJneHnW5KA7RMKMD87HEphS/npHZTTMfc5imHrOHeJt7NTC3/yUx v8gIMFb4/+Sf0gih4yZrqYrHdRFIjCuV+eI4Zwup+xxRc+tPfIAxqVU0Oa8vNqNf 8eyvpvYrkQhGeaXpNT8NT/XYpZ4b0Y/j3ecNi7AtEb0aBZfmEx5oZL7J254nTU6x bc+O+5Tqgrps61+WaKyq0UhE12/Eq+Vg0w2LtMIog4LQZzIMR4Fr07K48TOBOeTn 6ESd4Rd/ij83ag9QhBKonIN8QlLCrouG2txOyLneisXsGYtQ+iSrFvoV5GU5L+TX JTVrNSnOA7p/0fRWdKjKSWjemGHeX5vzoR7UZHP+Z2FYz7wbx9hi3O8oNTlz/g/u X1k+8WXY0uG5x6vMo6XpOuaRcNA2Fm/mEwAIRepbk4XDu7RdlGQ+WExEavEDVikX d3xukPDHr7kq3pEWsrm3jBTxSptsc4aPStOGCIBejhN4j+T6E/5aTVXi1RcfnGtk 96dLF5tNjwfI3tJp+dYzi4eo+BcujqIkQ+J2PXsRPxtLiKIcmHVa+HZzAPlCwxXj nzHqA5oVYNnyUWRRE6gm =Lfcs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RpqchZ26BWispMcB--