From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: dave@sr71.net
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
fenghua.yu@intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/11] x86, fpu: XSAVE cleanups and sanity checks
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:12:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825201201.CF766C1B@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
These patches make some updates to the x86 XSAVE code.
There are basically 5 things going on here:
* removal of the LWP (lightweight profiling) code
* naming and type cleanups
* removal of xfeatures_nr variable
* addition of AVX-512 C structures
* new sanity checks of XSAVE buffer sizing
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-25 20:12 Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86, fpu: rename xfeature_bit Dave Hansen
2015-08-26 16:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-08-26 16:10 ` Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86, fpu: kill LWP support Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86, fpu: remove xfeature_nr Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86, fpu: rework XSTATE_* macros to remove magic '2' Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86, fpu: rework YMM definition Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86, fpu: rework MPX 'xstate' types Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86, fpu: add helper xfeature_nr_enabled() instead of test_bit() Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86, fpu: add C structures for AVX-512 state components Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86, fpu: correct and check XSAVE xstate size calculations Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, fpu: check to ensure increasing-offset xstate offsets Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86, fpu: check CPU-provided sizes against struct declarations Dave Hansen
2015-08-26 16:18 ` Tim Chen
2015-08-26 16:19 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825201201.CF766C1B@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome