From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753217AbbHaPh4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:37:56 -0400
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:41589 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752714AbbHaPhz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:37:55 -0400
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:37:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yuyang.du@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] sched: add two functions for att(det)aching a
 task to(from) a cfs_rq
Message-ID: <20150831153749.GM18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1440069720-27038-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <1440069720-27038-6-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <20150820113516.GJ24261@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R>
 <20150831152138.GO19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150831152138.GO19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 05:21:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> +	if (!p->se.on_rq)
>  		return true;
>  
>  	return false;
> 
> 
> Does that make sense?

It does not.. never mind me.