From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754275AbbHaVki (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:40:38 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:34307 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752293AbbHaVkf (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:40:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:40:33 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Yoshinori Sato Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree Message-ID: <20150901074033.4282c9c4@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20150831074304.0ce16f9f@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20150831074304.0ce16f9f@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Yoshinori, On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:43:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > The h8300 tree today has been based on linux-next. This cannto work. > Please rebase this onto Linus' tree (or some other stable base). > > I cannot use your tree in this state, so it will be dropped from > linux-next until it is fixed. Also, Linus cannot pull it in this state. And now your tree conatins lots and lots of very old commits that do not even have Signed-off-by tags :-(. The version I have been using has a HEAD of commit: 99bcfda85f66 "Revert "asm-generic: {get,put}_user ptr argument evaluate only 1 time"" (which, it turns out" also has no Signed-off-by :-() Maybe you should reset your tree to that and try to move on from there. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au