From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752984AbbIATfZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:35:25 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0200.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.200]:55561 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751525AbbIATfV (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:35:21 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3867:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:4250:5007:6261:7875:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: crib50_1152a63bcc84c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2098 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:35:18 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Shaohua Li Cc: Thomas Gleixner , John Stultz , lkml , Prarit Bhargava , Richard Cochran , Daniel Lezcano , "Ingo Molnar" , Clark Williams , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] clocksource: Improve unstable clocksource detection Message-ID: <20150901153518.6de77eb0@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150901181404.GA3954400@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> References: <20150826171533.GA2189998@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> <20150831211233.GA1413758@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> <20150831223931.GA1586538@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> <20150901181404.GA3954400@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 11:14:17 -0700 Shaohua Li wrote: > > You think that blocking softirq execution for 42.9 seconds is normal? > > Seems we are living in a different universe. > > I don't say it's normal. I say it's not hard to trigger. > > > > it's just VM off. A softirq can hog the cpu. > > Please provide a test case that shows the softirq hogging the cpu for over 40 seconds. -- Steve