From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751069AbbIGKN5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 7 Sep 2015 06:13:57 -0400
Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:54543 "EHLO
	mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750840AbbIGKN4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Sep 2015 06:13:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 11:13:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        djkurtz@chromium.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-Koenig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <20150907101340.GS5313@sirena.org.uk>
References: <CAP_9M6973VAtM6WkP7gkzDMnJbRxmmmiCCuSxMU-_aQm4YQZbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150906000640.GR5313@sirena.org.uk>
 <CALW4P+KEsLAhQDHrMt-4Nw5Tb57cLp99T_uAdTpcQBX8_i1uSA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y4E6tNLPdzD/Rx2+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALW4P+KEsLAhQDHrMt-4Nw5Tb57cLp99T_uAdTpcQBX8_i1uSA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Cookie: Short people get rained on last.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be
 followed up by kfree"
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--Y4E6tNLPdzD/Rx2+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 03:22:43AM +0300, Alexey Klimov wrote:

> Sorry. Right now I see how I screwed up. Should I re-send it as single
> patch with all info included (marking as RESEND)?

No, it's OK - the patch itself was clear enough and I already applied it.

--Y4E6tNLPdzD/Rx2+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV7WNTAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ7OYH/AxnyATn1dKRMVyinAVv6P/1
0I8MDIgWyU1OXTwxKfK14D6U+/cfQqIEEUs+Nub2oXXNKRlHQ9RdZ6wgxsUm7Ynr
/vHGmgn5Xk/e8Hxeyw5zWzoSbhdk4vlRk1M08t5aKiG+SxNes5ReH0RuptrRZrw4
LJwRQd4gH1N0rQv+e9MjwpEpVuubQ7N1eIqVhqosIZxXqxjH3bldIEBXEMrlWyuN
+VBF0SEUTnT4jVgudEJogjCKD7/dTc9XShuHbBinzGpBnyyee2rl2cPaC20J3heC
kEUaaKIBP9ZXKfMyXlvdq3wKKMvuVuRmUilgEMqpbr4NZI7OFg+pfKfD9Vyi4Xw=
=bZG5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Y4E6tNLPdzD/Rx2+--