From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753267AbbIGO47 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:56:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51248 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750857AbbIGO46 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:56:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 15:56:47 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Jungseok Lee Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dave P Martin , James Morse Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: entry: Remove unnecessary calculation for S_SP in EL1h Message-ID: <20150907145646.GB13786@leverpostej> References: <1441376587-12979-1-git-send-email-jungseoklee85@gmail.com> <1441376587-12979-2-git-send-email-jungseoklee85@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1441376587-12979-2-git-send-email-jungseoklee85@gmail.com> Thread-Topic: [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: entry: Remove unnecessary calculation for S_SP in EL1h Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 03:23:05PM +0100, Jungseok Lee wrote: > Under EL1h, S_SP data is not seen in kernel_exit. Thus, x21 calculation > is not needed in kernel_entry. Currently, S_SP information is vaild only > when sp_el0 is used. I don't think this is true. The generic BUG implementation will grab the saved SP from the pt_regs, and with this change we'll report whatever happened to be in x21 instead. > Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > index e163518..d23ca0d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > @@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ > get_thread_info tsk // Ensure MDSCR_EL1.SS is clear, > ldr x19, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS] // since we can unmask debug > disable_step_tsk x19, x20 // exceptions when scheduling. > - .else > - add x21, sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE > .endif > mrs x22, elr_el1 > mrs x23, spsr_el1 Immediately after this we do: stp lr, x21, [sp, #S_LR] To store the LR and SP to the pt_regs which bug_handler would use. Am I missing smoething? Thanks, Mark.