From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:03:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150908080316.GU21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1509072139050.22877@knanqh.ubzr>
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 10:01:41PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 03:40:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thursday 03 September 2015 21:24:00 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > > > If 768MB targets were common place then it could be worth changing the
> > > > > default vmalloc size to accommodate this memory size and testing all the
> > > > > other targets to make sure no regressions are introduced. But given it
> > > > > is easy to change the default via the kernel cmdline, and that you lose
> > > > > only 8 MB otherwise, I don't think it is worth the trouble and/or the
> > > > > risk.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed.
> > >
> > > Well... I think there is a better solution.
> >
> > Doesn't this clash with things like:
> >
> > #define UNCACHEABLE_ADDR 0xff000000 /* IRQ_STAT */
> >
> > ?
>
> It looks like the move might actually "fix" it. That UNCACHEABLE_ADDR
> is mapped with:
>
> static struct map_desc ebsa110_io_desc[] __initdata = {
> /*
> * sparse external-decode ISAIO space
> */
> { /* IRQ_STAT/IRQ_MCLR */
> .virtual = (unsigned long)IRQ_STAT,
> .pfn = __phys_to_pfn(TRICK4_PHYS),
> .length = TRICK4_SIZE,
> .type = MT_DEVICE
> },
> [...]
> };
>
> This is passed to iotable_init(), then to create_mapping(). There you
> have:
>
> if ((md->type == MT_DEVICE || md->type == MT_ROM) &&
> md->virtual >= PAGE_OFFSET &&
> (md->virtual < VMALLOC_START || md->virtual >= VMALLOC_END)) {
> pr_warn("BUG: mapping for 0x%08llx at 0x%08lx out of vmalloc space\n",
> (long long)__pfn_to_phys((u64)md->pfn), md->virtual);
> }
>
> So you must have hit the above warning somehow. Incidentally, this
> IRQ_STAT entry is the only one that happened to be outside the vmalloc
> area. By moving VMALLOC_END from 0xff000000 to 0xff800000 the warning
> will be gone.
No, there are other legacy platforms which have mappings above that.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-08 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-03 2:24 [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000 Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03 5:11 ` [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03 8:00 ` [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000 Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-03 8:28 ` Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03 8:34 ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-03 8:43 ` Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-03 9:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-03 10:30 ` [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB Yongtaek Lee
2015-09-04 1:24 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 11:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-07 15:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 15:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-07 15:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-07 19:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-08 0:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-08 2:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-08 8:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-09-08 14:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-03 9:07 ` Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000 Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150908080316.GU21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=ytk.lee@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®