From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752323AbbIQPrq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:47:46 -0400
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:34732 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752052AbbIQPro (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:47:44 -0400
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:42:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, lizefan@huawei.com,
        cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified
 hierarchy
Message-ID: <20150917154220.GO3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <CAPM31RKPUzuiwVs3rs=4M1Kt=+c9WX8o84r-iO4semfznvYmHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150824213600.GK28944@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <CAPM31RKCO-yxtVf+iUs8FOqk6uGSyixEXtx9zSzxQ1uOGtkDqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150824221935.GN28944@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <CAPM31RK08pC3g9qx+TEw6PQvtHk8idKE3OALQN8cFr_QOuT3FA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150825210234.GE26785@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <CAPM31RJvrPL7S37=yhxMA5OGUFNUfPurTZ21nfH6eFRb15ZGtw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150912144007.GA8942@htj.duckdns.org>
 <20150917143527.GJ3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20150917145309.GA7205@mtj.duckdns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150917145309.GA7205@mtj.duckdns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:53:09AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I'd be happy to fail a CPU down for user tasks where this is the last
> > runnable CPU of.
> 
> So, yeah, we need to keep these things consistent across global and
> cgroup cases.
> 

Ok, I'll go extend the sysctl_sched_strict_affinity to the cpuset bits
too then :-)