From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754704AbbIRRCe (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:02:34 -0400 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:58706 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754185AbbIRRCd (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:02:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:02:26 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Murali Karicheri Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off Message-ID: <20150918170226.GK21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <55FC3587.7010601@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55FC3587.7010601@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:02:15PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote: > While chasing a fix for a deadlock in netcp driver with debug options > enabled, i bumped on another warning shown below.. Looks like I need to > enable CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER as well to get rid of this. Have anyone seen > this? My google search showed me some connection with this option and I > enabled it as well and I don't see the warning anymore. Any idea if this is > a false alarm or a real bug? Looks like I need to enable > CONFIG_IRQSOFF_TRACER as well. If so, I can send a patch. Either way let me > know. Do you have this commit applied? commit 3302caddf10ad50710dbb7a94ccbdb3ad5bf1412 Author: Russell King Date: Thu Aug 20 16:13:37 2015 +0100 ARM: entry: efficiency cleanups -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.