From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754832AbbIRWJE (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:09:04 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:35786 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754774AbbIRWJB (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:09:01 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 00:08:59 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: Josh Wu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: at91: at91sam9n12ek/dts: fix the led labels name Message-ID: <20150918220859.GJ4287@piout.net> References: <27620a5315a0fd314e21eac4afbfe87f1350b099.1441897573.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <20150910152415.GN3237@piout.net> <55FC15B9.9070407@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55FC15B9.9070407@atmel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 18/09/2015 at 15:46:33 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote : > > The only concern being that this renaming will break userspace software > > assuming the LEDs are wrongly named. Is there anything that has been > > released by atmel that uses the wrong names (and my guess is yess and > > that is why there are named as such) and do you care about it? > > My guess is that the label was wrongly named from the beginning and no > board revision had the "d6" nor "d7" names. > It makes sense to rename them for the evaluation kit... > Yeah, I'm fine with the change. I was simply warning that it may break some demos Atmel distributed before (but I didn't ever seen or used those anyway so I may be wrong). -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com