From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934322AbbI1Pva (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:51:30 -0400
Received: from mail-yk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:33909 "EHLO
	mail-yk0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S934034AbbI1Pv2 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:51:28 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:51:24 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PIDs Controller Limit
Message-ID: <20150928155124.GD2589@mtj.duckdns.org>
References: <CAOviyajLPivBQLauYHWTW71PHyvF15X=Ocu8JDc-92s0k3XRwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150925153912.GG4449@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <CAOviyagSDkNWY1X7d=nAhgqkOz2fE+ck+rS9Fn_hfMbCZHRyKw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOviyagSDkNWY1X7d=nAhgqkOz2fE+ck+rS9Fn_hfMbCZHRyKw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello,

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 09:11:02AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> Well, it might be confusing that a limit of `0` is not different from
> a limit of `1`. Especially since someone might think that a limit of
> `0` means "no processes AT ALL", which is wrong. Although, I guess
> they should've just RTFM'd in that case.

I really don't think it matters.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun