mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: dave@sr71.net
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 23/25] x86, pkeys: actually enable Memory Protection Keys in CPU
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:18:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150928191826.BB4AB4D4@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150928191817.035A64E2@viggo.jf.intel.com>


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

This sets the bit in 'cr4' to actually enable the protection
keys feature.  We also include a boot-time disable for the
feature "nopku".

Seting X86_CR4_PKE will cause the X86_FEATURE_OSPKE cpuid
bit to appear set.  At this point in boot, identify_cpu()
has already run the actual CPUID instructions and populated
the "cpu features" structures.  We need to go back and
re-run identify_cpu() to make sure it gets updated values.

We *could* simply re-populate the 11th word of the cpuid
data, but this is probably quick enough.

Also note that with the cpu_has() check and X86_FEATURE_PKU
present in disabled-features.h, we do not need an #ifdef
for setup_pku().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---

 b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    3 ++
 b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c        |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c~pkeys-50-should-be-last-patch arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c~pkeys-50-should-be-last-patch	2015-09-28 11:39:51.455433378 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c	2015-09-28 11:39:51.461433651 -0700
@@ -289,6 +289,46 @@ static __always_inline void setup_smap(s
 }
 
 /*
+ * Protection Keys are not available in 32-bit mode.
+ */
+static bool pku_disabled = false;
+static __always_inline void setup_pku(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PKU))
+		return;
+	if (pku_disabled)
+		return;
+
+	cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_PKE);
+	/*
+	 * Seting X86_CR4_PKE will cause the X86_FEATURE_OSPKE
+	 * cpuid bit to be set.  We need to ensure that we
+	 * update that bit in this CPU's "cpu_info".
+	 */
+	get_cpu_cap(c);
+}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+static __init int setup_disable_pku(char *arg)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Do not clear the X86_FEATURE_PKU bit.  All of the
+	 * runtime checks are against OSPKE so clearing the
+	 * bit does nothing.
+	 *
+	 * This way, we will see "pku" in cpuinfo, but not
+	 * "ospke", which is exactly what we want.  It shows
+	 * that the CPU has PKU, but the OS has not enabled it.
+	 * This happens to be exactly how a system would look
+	 * if we disabled the config option.
+	 */
+	pr_info("x86: 'nopku' specified, disabling Memory Protection Keys\n");
+	pku_disabled = true;
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("nopku", setup_disable_pku);
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+
+/*
  * Some CPU features depend on higher CPUID levels, which may not always
  * be available due to CPUID level capping or broken virtualization
  * software.  Add those features to this table to auto-disable them.
@@ -947,6 +987,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_
 	init_hypervisor(c);
 	x86_init_rdrand(c);
 	x86_init_cache_qos(c);
+	setup_pku(c);
 
 	/*
 	 * Clear/Set all flags overriden by options, need do it
diff -puN Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~pkeys-50-should-be-last-patch Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt~pkeys-50-should-be-last-patch	2015-09-28 11:39:51.457433469 -0700
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt	2015-09-28 11:39:51.462433696 -0700
@@ -955,6 +955,9 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
 			See Documentation/x86/intel_mpx.txt for more
 			information about the feature.
 
+	nopku		[X86] Disable Memory Protection Keys CPU feature found
+			in some Intel CPUs.
+
 	eagerfpu=	[X86]
 			on	enable eager fpu restore
 			off	disable eager fpu restore
_

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-28 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-28 19:18 [PATCH 00/25] x86: Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86, pkeys: cpuid bit definition Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86, pkeys: Add Kconfig option Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86, fpu: add placeholder for Processor Trace XSAVE state Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:01   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86, pkey: add PKRU xsave fields and data structure(s) Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 17:17     ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86, pkeys: PTE bits for storing protection key Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:51   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86, pku: define new CR4 bit Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, pkeys: store protection in high VMA flags Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86, pkeys: new page fault error code bit: PF_PK Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:54   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 17:19     ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, pkeys: arch-specific protection bits Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, pkeys: pass VMA down in to fault signal generation code Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 13/25] mm: factor out VMA fault permission checking Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86, pkeys: notify userspace about protection key faults Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, pkeys: add functions to fetch PKRU Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 15/25] x86, pkeys: check VMAs and PTEs for protection keys Dave Hansen
2015-10-22 20:57   ` Jerome Glisse
2015-10-22 21:23     ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-22 22:25       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-10-23  0:49         ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, pkeys: optimize fault handling in access_error() Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 14/25] mm: simplify get_user_pages() PTE bit handling Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, pkeys: dump PTE pkey in /proc/pid/smaps Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, pkeys: dump PKRU with other kernel registers Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86, pkeys: add Kconfig prompt to existing config option Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 20/25] mm, multi-arch: pass a protection key in to calc_vm_flag_bits() Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86: wire up mprotect_key() system call Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 21/25] mm: implement new " Dave Hansen
2015-09-29  6:39   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-29 14:16     ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, pkeys: add self-tests Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, pkeys: Documentation Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 20:34   ` Andi Kleen
2015-09-28 20:41     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150928191826.BB4AB4D4@viggo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome