From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933153AbbI3Rcv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:32:51 -0400
Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:39983 "EHLO
	casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932295AbbI3Rcr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:32:47 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:27:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        riel@redhat.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] sched/idle: run-time support for setting idle polling
Message-ID: <20150930172713.GV3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1442954062-28578-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
 <1593595.NpzC8TsdGC@vostro.rjw.lan>
 <20150930154835.GP3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20150930131610.1c2ba9c2@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150930131610.1c2ba9c2@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 01:16:10PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:48:35 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> > Ideally every cpuidle driver would get 'polling' as a
> > default state and the QoS constraints might select it if nothing else
> > matches.
> 
> So, I didn't know we had support for polling from the idle
> thread via cpuidle. This solves the first part of the problem.

I'm not sure we do; I'm saying that's what we should do ;-)