From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andrew@lunn.ch, linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] net: dsa: Complete and fix the dsa unbinding
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:20:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151001172044.GA25785@ketchup.mtl.sfl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560D4BDE.3080400@baylibre.com>
Hi Neil,
On Oct. Thursday 01 (40) 05:06 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 07:43 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 30/09/15 01:21, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> In order to cleanly unbind the dsa core, either as a module removal,
> >> or a platform device unbind, switch the allocation the their devm_
> >> counterparts and complete the destroy functions.
> >>
> >> The last patch is an experimental way to exit the probe when no
> >> switch is found in the discover process.
> >>
> >> The patches are based on the current net-next.
> >
> > I looked at the patches and they bring DSA in a better direction. For
> > future submissions, could you CC people who recently worked on DSA, like
> > Andrew Lunn, Guenter Roeck, Vivien Didelot and myself? We can typically
> > give your patches a try fairly quickly.
> >
> > In case you are seriously considering making DSA a loadable module,
> > there were an earlier attempt here:
> >
> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/345803
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >>
> >> Neil Armstrong (3):
> >> net: dsa: Use devm_ prefixed allocations
> >> net: dsa: complete dsa_switch_destroy calls
> >> net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found
> >>
> >> net/dsa/dsa.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> >
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for the tests and reviews.
>
> My first intent is to make dynamic unbind/bind reliable, the reliable loadable module support
> is a more complex target, but starting with unbind is a simpler start.
>
> Should I re-post with the missing people, the Tested-by & without the RFC tag ?
I didn't take a look at it, but given Florian's feedback, it seems to
make sense, so I'd suggest to resend it without the RFC prefix.
If a patch in the serie got a "Tested-by:" or whatever tag, include it
when resending, only if you didn't modify this patch in the meantime.
Thanks,
-v
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 8:21 Neil Armstrong
2015-09-30 17:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-10-01 15:06 ` Neil Armstrong
2015-10-01 17:20 ` Vivien Didelot [this message]
2015-10-01 15:19 ` Neil Armstrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151001172044.GA25785@ketchup.mtl.sfl \
--to=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®