From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754072AbbJHA4t (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:56:49 -0400
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:36446 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751501AbbJHA4s (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:56:48 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,652,1437462000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="787138281"
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 08:56:38 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, kbuild-all@01.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH 2/2] mfd: rtsx: fix build warning
Message-ID: <20151008005638.GA23669@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
References: <1444220929-18949-2-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
 <201510072007.NVdfT1ah%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <20151007124652.GA19200@sudip-pc>
 <20151007134816.GB15834@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
 <20151007154125.GA20077@sudip-pc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151007154125.GA20077@sudip-pc>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:11:25PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 09:48:16PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:16:52PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 08:40:37PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > > Hi Sudip,
> > > > 
> > > > [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
> > > v4.3-rc4 is not appropriate base. Please use next-20151007 for both.
> > 
> > OK. FYI, if you use [PATCH (next|-next|linux-next)] next time,
> > the robot will select linux-next/master as the base tree.
> Ok. Great. And for staging should it be [PATCH staging-testing] ?

It looks some patches already use the form [PATCH staging], I wonder
which branch Greg typically apply them to, staging-testing or staging-next?

Thanks,
Fengguang