From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757528AbbJHNLL (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:11:11 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:49148 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754151AbbJHNLJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:11:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 15:11:42 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Gerst , Denys Vlasenko , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/36] x86/asm: Re-add manual CFI infrastructure Message-ID: <20151008131142.GB459@nazgul.tnic> References: <4c70bb98a8b773c8ccfaabf6745e569ff43e7f65.1444091584.git.luto@kernel.org> <20151006082305.GB18287@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:21:41AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > OK, I'll strip out the push, movq, etc stuff for v3. I'll leave all > of the CFI_XYZ macros, even the unused one, because that's only a > couple of lines of code and they all have very simple and obvious > meanings (or as simple as the underlying directives, anyway). If they're going to be used by the vDSO only, maybe they all should go into a header which is private to the vDSO only so that people don't get any ideas and the gunk starts spreading again... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --