From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933776AbbJIRCg (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:02:36 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.10]:42825 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932073AbbJIRCf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:02:35 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1567:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:4250:5007:6261:7875:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080:21212,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: act29_16285ba22cf15 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1481 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:02:31 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Will Deacon Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Yang Shi , catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.long@linaro.org, panand@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_break_hook Message-ID: <20151009130231.414489c3@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20151009090550.GA26278@arm.com> References: <1444080771-22468-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> <20151008235538.GJ3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151009090550.GA26278@arm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:05:50 +0100 Will Deacon wrote: > > Looks more plausible to me. Does it look OK to you, Steven? > > This is already in mainline as a fix, so please shout loudly if you think > it's broken (it looked ok to me and didn't cause any regressions in my > testing). Looks good to me. -- Steve