From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751703AbbJLHXs (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 03:23:48 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:37369 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751406AbbJLHXr (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 03:23:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:23:44 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mike Galbraith Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuyang Du Subject: Re: 4.3 group scheduling regression Message-ID: <20151012072344.GM3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1444292390.3389.100.camel@gmail.com> <201510081054.t98AsL1U003456@como.maths.usyd.edu.au> <20151008111959.GM3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1444483369.2804.9.camel@gmail.com> <20151010170142.GI3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1444530318.3363.40.camel@gmail.com> <1444585321.4169.18.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1444585321.4169.18.camel@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 07:42:01PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > (change subject, CCs) > > On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 04:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Is the interactivity the same (horrible) at fe32d3cd5e8e (ie, before the > > > load tracking rewrite from Yuyang)? > > It is the rewrite, 9d89c257dfb9c51a532d69397f6eed75e5168c35. Just to be sure, so 9d89c257dfb9^1 is good, while 9d89c257dfb9 is bad? And *groan*, _just_ the thing I need on a monday morning ;-)